With inflation it's still higher today (especially if you stay at a hotel), but not as much as the article makes it out to be.
https://clickamericana.com/topics/family-parenting/life-for-...
With inflation it's still higher today (especially if you stay at a hotel), but not as much as the article makes it out to be.
https://clickamericana.com/topics/family-parenting/life-for-...
The parks are out of control. You pay more for longer wait times. On the other hand if they lowered prices/let more people in, the wait times and crowding would be even worse and there would be complaining about that. The real problem is they just need more parks - some in the midwest wouldn't kill them so people wouldn't have to travel as far. Spread the load out.
It might have just been bias growing up with Disneyland but I much preferred it to the magic kingdom - it seemed like they watered the individual parks down to encourage people to park hop.
The real issue is I think a lot of companies just assumed they couldn't compete at the same level as Disney so they didn't even bother trying. I think Universal with Harry Potter found out that yes, you can steal attendees from the house of mouse and providing a themed experience is also doable - they are far from invulnerable. I'm eagerly looking forward to Universal's Epic Universe; hopefully it will light a fire under others (hey Cedar Fair - there's more to parks than just coasters!) that it is worth it to up their game too.
It did end up helping to encourage park hopping, you’re right, but that wasn’t the original idea. Another site would be an interesting idea (especially if Disney loses the protections they have in Florida, making a 5th gate even harder to build), although I’d rather they just fix EPCOT :/
The article literally covers this, both in their infographic for Disney, and in the paragraph preceding.
>(One important clarifying note: Back in 1960, you paid for the park admission ticket and the rides separately. We’ve combined those costs below.)
Maybe read the article before you comment about its faults...
(In any case, I missed that comment when I read the article the first time, you're right. Sorry!)