In their "About us" page they decry "consensus science" and "global warming alarmists"..
Which is a way too common issue with a lot of the online reporting on German fission; Giving straight up wrong history and info based on very questionable motives.
Case in point; The article, once again, claims it was Merkel who decided the exit, allegedly in 2011, when that's plain and simply wrong. Merkel pushed trough extremely unpopular running time extensions in 2010, then Fukushima exploded in 2011 and the running time extensions were revoked during the course of the atom-moratorium, as during safety inspections the reactors were found not to be safe enough to run that much longer [0].
That's also why some reactors never came back online from the moratorium; They were found too unsafe to be turned back on. But their remaining electricity contingency was added to the remaining ones, which is what will allow them to run for longer.
At least if the German government will pay for that extra run time, as the nuclear operators themselves are unwilling to do so [1].
There is literally decades of more history there, several big government subsidies for the nuclear industry along the lines of "Privatized profits, socialized losses" [2], while at the same time sabotaging the renewable built out [3], all under allegedly "nuclear hating" Merkel.
[0] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom-Moratorium
[1] https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wirtschaft/akw-betreiber-gegen-l...
[2] https://www.dw.com/en/german-government-does-nuclear-waste-d...
[3] https://www.dw.com/en/renewable-sector-wary-of-cdu-promises/...