63% of University of North Carolina Class of 2025 is female

As someone involved in universities - uni's that are blue are actively discriminatory against men. People from the outside can argue as they like, but when you're actually in it you are told that 1. Men are the cause of bad things everywhere. Congress, Jeff bezos, trump, your typical ideas of patriarchy. 2. Men are responsible for and initiate abuse always. The idea of woman abusing men is not even entertained. 3. Criticism of this means you're sexist/bad/undeserving of life. If you look at how people act on Twitter, that's close to it.

These are actual required classes and is how administration enforces policy.

Most people are taking their ideas of how uni politics were 10-20 years ago. But things have changed. Psuedo-woke Twitter is unfortunately real people, and they have jobs in government.

On top of this:

Universities act as their own courts, they can and will eject students for heresay claims. No due process.

Universities are textbook dictatorships. The students cannot vote for whom makes the rules. Yet they are directly affected.

Their costs and spending have risen dramatically over time. They argue this is because of less government aid - it's really because they don't control spending. They will overspend on cafeteria decor and luxurious dorms. Politically motivated programs that students are forced to pay for.

Why on earth would any young man go into that when there's plenty of trade roles hiring? Make good money, start a family, own your own life.

The last psychatrist remarked [1] (I miss you), sadly, that women move there where men no longer are interested. With the fall of worth of [2] university education, the percentage of women increases.

[1] "when more women enter a field, it means less men did, and if the men stopped going there, where did they go? Why did they leave? I assume they aren't home with the kids, right?[...] if power seeking men aren't running for Senate, where did they go?" - https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2013/01/no_self-respecting_w...

[2] "Ernst & Young will no longer require new hires to have a degree" https://medium.com/signals-of-change/ernst-young-will-no-lon...

Shouldn’t we be artificially limiting the amount of women accepted in order to ensure gender equity? Isn’t this what we normally do, for example to prevent the best Universities from being almost entirely Asian?

I'd be curious to know what percent of applicants are male/female. Also, what is the average or median profile of boys/girls who apply? Is the school engaging in affirmative action to dampen the sex disparity?

On that page there's an "Enrollment by Gender" graph which shows that since 2009 (which is when the graph starts) there's been significantly higher number of females than males over there every year.

75% of engineering students in Tehran University have been women, in the past.

Equality!! For reals though, of the gender ratio is skewed too much students will stop enrolling.

Guessing the numbers will soon skew even more towards universities in states where you can get an abortion. It sure is where I’d try to go if I were a young woman.

19% intend to major in biology, 19% intend to become physicians.. is that normal in American universities? Seems high to me.

It's 2021, not 2025. I wonder if this means women are more poised to become breadwinners or if going to university is becoming less correlated with it.