Imo, the only hypothetical reason for Musk not to buy it would be because the real numbers on the bot issue showed the company has seriously defrauded investors, and the stock goes to almost zero. That's implausible to me. It's kind of an outsider case where shorts could get squeezed pretty hard if they're wrong about that, as a Musk owned Twitter has huge growth in front of it.

However, I'd propose there is also a counter-intuitive case to be made that Twitter's management has an incentive to drag out the court case and delay the sale even at the cost of wrecking the company stock if it preserves their control for just a few more months because it gives them one last election cycle of popular narrative influence before the U.S. midterms. It's just a company that has made money for some people, but the party is facing an existential threat at the ballot box in November, and it's plausible they agree to damn the torpedoes and unleash legal chaos that sinks Twitter's stock price but hangs on to control of the company (and its narrative) for just a few more weeks in support of the elections. They would even have tacit support of establishment (R)'s who would be glad to see their MAGA problem handled for them with deplatforming policies.

The strategy there is like burning your ships during a retreat to prevent the enemy from using them after it overruns your perimeter with an (R) controlled house and senate, and a weak record going into 2024. These platforms are political operations, and they're not going to risk a repeat of 2016. This is wildly speculative, but maybe Twitter takes advantage of Musk's balking on the deal and holds on to content policy control until after midterms, then they scuttle the ship and hand over the ashes to him at the reduced price.

Crazy?