When I read the parent comment, I imagined a panel saying:
"Oh dear, Poor John there was born without a left leg. Alright, everyone else line up in front of the man with a meat cleaver"
"Oh dear, Poor John there was born without a left leg. Alright, everyone else line up in front of the man with a meat cleaver"
That’s a grossly capitalist exploitative viewpoint which overlooks hidden power structures to excuse any degree of inequality. Any difference whatsoever between anybody can be traced back to hidden power structures, and to deny this is fascism and morally equivalent to the January 6 toppling of our democracy and also slavery, which founded our nation in 1619.
It’s time for a discussion of alternatives to the engine of inequality called capitalism. You see, when I buy something from you, we are both exploited in ways we know not, because they are hidden.
The more you know…
My point is that the government in fact does this via legislation (the ADA), are you willing to argue against it to remain consistent?
The base claim was that after reading JasonFruit's comment with the interpretation I had, your own comment seemed like a tangent.
Now, which of us interpreted his comment correctly? I have no idea.
Neither was I attempting to pass comment on the badness/goodness of ADA.
Anyways, have a good day sir!