> I'd say the median number of articles reviewed per person in a given year is 10.
That's a pretty light annual workload. How do you get to be one of those people?
Or do those people have other work to do?
That's a pretty light annual workload. How do you get to be one of those people?
Or do those people have other work to do?
Yes, they have other work to do.
I'm pointing out that the number of papers someone reviews in a year is not even distantly related to the amount of attention they have available to devote to the job.