Hacker News Reader

Comment by TheIronYuppie | Hacker News Reader

I'm sorry, but you'll need to explain this a lot more.

I'm happy to answer questions directly, or discuss any sources, but I'm not able to respond to this point by point because this just is not correct. I'm on here all the time if you'd like to talk further, or email me directly - david (dot) aronchick (at) protocol (dot) ai

Disclosure: I am co-director of Research Development at Protocol Labs.

View on HN

My comment had no questions, but thanks for making yourself available. I'll be happy to share all kinds of details from 2017 onwards, but only with someone from the SEC/CFTC. This, sadly, is very correct. I am the source.

> I am the source.

And the rest of us should believe you despite your refusal to articulate any sort of rationale for your conclusion... why, exactly?

You all should, as the bitidiots say, do your own research

I have. Did you? Maybe you would have a stronger argument if you were actually willing to share said self-research and subject it to peer review ;)

Please post a chart of miner payouts per gb per hour for the past 5 years.

And then post the Protocol Labs cap table inception + changes over the same time frame.

And then post the FIL loan books from the biggest miners/market makers.

And then you will have actually done research and likely will stop shitposting

And precisely none of those things, even in aggregate, support whatever semblance of a point you're attempting to make. Maybe you ain't in the best of positions to be lecturing others about shitposting, eh bud?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com