> is simply projection
oh, cool, now you are insulting me. So why am I childish?
He should have just blocked anyone who downvoted his responses.
Also a fork of PuTTY? Who cares.
The decision was not negligible as far as I believe, but if you'd like to have a constructive discussion of that, rather than personal putdown, please go ahead.
Look, I’m not the person that insulted you, but I’m sorry this happened to you if it means you’ll reevaluate your perspective of this discussion.
Let me be clear - I don't agree with your perspective, either on how offended you think I am or should be, (or how relevant it is to this thread outside purposeful trolling, with personal attacks) or how negligible the naming issue is. The onus is on you to substantiate these judgements.
A more level-headed version of what I was trying to communicate is that I agree that you're probably not as offended as I judged you to be by your replies in this thread. But if you're not as offended as I think you are, then why is this an issue at all - either regarding the replies you're getting in this thread or Kovid's communication that you linked earlier?
I just don't see why that mattered in the first place. It wasn't perfect communication, but it seemed like you were using this to make the point that Kovid's communication should indeed be at the forefront of the discussion of Calibre's development.
b/c I dislike unsubstantiated accusations of "projection", it feels like lazy point making of "no u".
wrt Kovid's communication - it wasn't imperfect communication on Kovid's part, his intent was clear I think. And I responded to the claim that Kovid's only "crime" was some other matter, but he was involved in this flame also.