You could have a set of trends that are calculated to cause maximum harm to local eco systems.
Location based serving makes it easy to disseminate these campaigns to exact locations. This is an incredibly potent weapon and seems it's been flying under the radar for quite some time now.
And no matter how much evidence you present, nobody will ever take it seriously.
Not their first platform-enabled genocide (that was years ago), and still not doing anything effectively to mitigate it
>This isn’t the first time that we have found that Facebook is unable to detect clear examples of hate speech: earlier this year we found that they were unable to detect Burmese language hate speech directed against the Rohingya minority.
These genocides are not Facebook incidentally intersecting with the real world and reflecting its reality... These genocides, in how they have succeeded, would not have been possible without Facebook's implicit cooperation. Facebook's profits off the ads responsible for these atrocities, or conversely the lower ad revenue of these so-called second tier countries that are not Facebook's primary focus (I can find this reference again if requested), are a curious incentive to not eagerly take meaningful action
They just improved it manipulating dumb children to do the dirt job and take all the risk.
The genius part is that children will do it just for a pat in the back.
As for that flying under the radar, I suppose that depends on how attentive a person was to the whole Cambridge Analytica fiasco.