Yes, I'm a bit far out about this stuff, but education is big business and the more this sort of idea spreads, the more it erodes publishers' profits - they'll fight back sooner or later (maybe it's already happening?)
Yes, I'm a bit far out about this stuff, but education is big business and the more this sort of idea spreads, the more it erodes publishers' profits - they'll fight back sooner or later (maybe it's already happening?)
If that were an actionable offense, you'd be able to sue half the startups in Silicon Valley.
B) there may have been some unspoken agreements with earlier decision makers which, while not contractual, might still constitute some good faith issue.
I really think there's probably less a chance of lawsuits specifically, and more likely variable pricing, with "use of free texts" thrown in as an equation that's not shared with anyone but mgt and sales teams.
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/08/09/12/2326251/telco-sues-m...
These people would lose their very lucrative business. They'd let their lawyers figure out something to sue for, but the decision to find some way to sue would be based on the prospect of losing sales, not on knowing what legal wrong they had suffered.
Remember SCO? They kept up that lawsuit for about a decade. Good lawyers can find some reason to sue.