American cities need to grow up, and let housing be built
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
The current problem is that there aren’t enough homes near where work is. Localities love to build commercial RE instead of housing as they are lucrative and doesn’t need schools to be built. Putting a cap on the commercial RE to residential RE within 30 mins is a reasonable thing to do and will not only force more efficient use of commercial RE, but will also force them to build good homes and schools nearby.
Currently there is a glut of commercial RE and owners are leaving it empty instead of reducing rent prices. If politicians can push for this policy, it will not only be a popular vote grabbing policy, but has the potential to solve the problem.
Much of this is borne of NIMBYist zoning rules, which have an often not-so-nice history behind them. And I get that we don't want a chemical plant next door, but I fail to see why a nail salon cannot be side-by-side with an apartment. If single-family-only is OK, we can have higher density permitted but stronger noise ordinances.
Why can't we have more sensible regulations that permit higher density and just just forced single-family or light commerical, but never the two mixed?
So you can't just "let housing be built". You have to plan a community, or you'll just lurch from one problem to the next.
Large towers create unhappy people. Humans were not meant to live that way.