Two dead after Tesla drives into back of parked semi at FL rest stop
orlandosentinel.com
orlandosentinel.com
Presume that it wasn't for a moment. 66 year old in the drivers seat. Car does something unexpected and then drives at full speed into a solid object.
If this was anything other than a Tesla, the headline wouldn't mention what kind of car it was. Because the author is trying to imply this is the fault if Tesla, with no evidence.
117 People die per day in the US alone from automobile accidents
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_fatality_rate_in...
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/overview/age-of-dr...: drivers 65 to 74 account for 13.7% of licensed drivers, but represent only 6.9% of drivers in all crashes and 7.7% of drivers in fatal crashes.
>Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in your country. We are engaged on the issue and committed to looking at options that support our full range of digital offerings to your market. We continue to identify technical compliance solutions that will provide all readers with our award-winning journalism.
Seems a lot more plausible than the Orlando Sentinel licensing their content in Europe.
Do these type of accidents happen much with non-Tesla vehicles? It could just be media reporting bias, or it could be that people don't slam into parked semi trucks on a regular basis.
How is that even a commute anymore? In Europe that would be cross-country roadtrip.
I mean I can drive through a wall with my car quite happily lol
(As do most modern higher-end cars now.)
Assuming that the photo depicts the location correctly, my first guess is that an automatic parking feature is involved, because I would be surprised that any driver--much less one with a passenger in the front seat--would so completely miss the fact that an eighteen-wheeler truck is in the parking space while attempting to park there, and continue to miss it for so long to embed the car that deep underneath.
Honest question, I don't know much about crashing cars.
> According to FHP, a 66 year old female driver was behind the wheel of a 2015 Tesla traveling southbound on I-75 at mile marker 382, when, for unknown reasons, the Tesla left the interstate and crashed into the trailer of a truck parked at the Paynes Prairie Rest Area.
That is, the Tesla wasn't intentionally driving around in the rest area -- it started out on the highway, but swerved off the road and ended up hitting a truck in the rest area. So the car was probably travelling at highway speeds, and had tons of momentum when it hit the truck.
[1]: https://cdllife.com/2022/two-people-in-tesla-killed-after-cr...
On this particular instance, it seems like there was some kind of bar but not the kind that can withstand a crash.
It's almost certain death sentence when a car goes under a semi, the passengers are squashed by the trailer as the cars body travels under it. It's beyond me how this is street legal.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKP5Djjt2Vs
Edit: Upon closer inspection of the photos, now I'm inclined to believe that there is a proper bar that cut through the Tesla. It looks like the bar did not break, went through the car.
I believe you forgot the word "most" in front of that phrase
Admittedly, the photo on the article does manage to almost perfectly obscure where the bar would have been. You can clearly see the ladder steps on the right, but the bar that would be below it is obscured by the lid of the EMTs' toolbox.
Open up a larger version of the image in the article here (yay for URLs): https://cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/tronc/..., and you can actually just make out the red/white flashing on the bar below the bottom rung of the ladder and the lid of the toolbox. So the bar was clearly there. It also more clearly shows that the bar cleaved through the frunk pretty easily.
2015 Tesla = Original MobilEye Autopilot.
Here's another car crash but no one cares because it doesnt have Tesla in the name.
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/6-injured-after-car-cr...
Tesla is not so far.
The driver of that vehicle only posrssed the power to affect a very smmall number of people with their irresponsible act.
The maker of that car isn't making claims that you can drive their cars drunk, and that car didn't have a "drunkpilot" button.
Elon is voluntarily pushing something which is unwise, wich affects many many more people. The primary guilt is the marketing not the tech itself. There is no excuse for any of these accidents, because human behavior is very well studied. You don't get to create the option to let a car drive itself, and name it autopilot, and then claim ignorance and innocense when people get in the back seat and go to sleep and every other crazy thing, no matter what you write in a manual somewhere.
When, Toyota has even a mere gas pedal glitch, it's a huge deal and all the cars get recalled and fixed, and it was a legitomate honest error while trying to be responsible, not an error while trying to be irresponsible.
Tesla deserves far more heat than they are getting.
ie. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-17/autopilot-incompetenc...
Two people in Tesla killed after crashing into parked semi at Florida rest stop - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32023337 - July 2022 (51 comments)