> Violators could face a misdemeanor, but only after being verbally warned and continuing to record anyway. > Exceptions were made for people at the center of an interaction with police...
They are working, you are not involved, they ask you to not interfere, you cannot be bothered to move a couple yards, and the constitution should worry about you?
> This is a horrible law.
No, this is just prejudice on your side or lack of reading comprehension... or of reading at all.
> They are working, you are not involved, they ask you to not interfere, you cannot be bothered to move a couple yards, and the constitution should worry about you?
Everything you just detailed has just as much relevance to people who are not recording. Why do you think the law called out recording within that radius?
Yes.