Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by gvb | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

gvb

"Starlink for RVs is not designed for use while in motion."

Marine starlink needs to compensate for rolling, pitching, and forward motion.

View on HN

Sounds like they added a gimbal or something?

These are common on radar systems, and nothing to sneeze at.

The antenna is electronically steered. The pictures do not show any gimbal but they probably had to add an IMU to measure the motion of the boat (antenna) and adjust the antenna beam steering to compensate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_measurement_unit

The Starlink Dishy already has an IMU in it. It does look like maybe the beam array is simply bigger.

Starlink uses beam forming. It shouldn't need a gimbal.

The phased array can probably only do so much and a gimbal might still be needed to compensate for movement outside of what the phased array can handle?

It can at least go horizon to horizon now. The satellites aren’t geosynchronous. I generally only have one satellite overhead at a time. They take about 5-10 minutes to fly by.

Doesn't the normal Starlink have an Az-El motor for rough positioning? Beam steering only gets you so far, and the more off-boresight you get, the worse the performance.

I imagine this has a larger array. The more antennas, the greater the resolution. I’m sure they’ll use the motor for rough positioning but I doubt they’ll add a gimbal. That seems overkill.

The beam steering only operates in one dimension. The dish has to physically rotate and tilt so that the beam steering line coincides with the satellites orbit.

Seems to work in more than one direction for me. The satellites pass over head in two different directions and the receiver never moves.

phased array antenna, so its either a software switch or they simply detect if your station moves too much without paying for the privilege and disable/throttle you.

This guy has been testing it without one

https://www.reddit.com/r/SailboatCruising/comments/vovaxs/st...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com