> This is great but too big of a hammer for most use cases.
This is not in any way intended for most use-cases, it's very clearly intended for a single, specific, uncommon use-case. The press release says as much more than once.
This is not in any way intended for most use-cases, it's very clearly intended for a single, specific, uncommon use-case. The press release says as much more than once.
In other words: there's no "instead" here, any more than there's an "instead" between e.g. UI work and backend server work. Different people, different competencies, concurrent capacity.
Regardless, I was just lamenting that we don't (yet) have a feature that should be table stakes at this point.