Baserow challenges Airtable with an open source no-code database platform
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Basic features (e.g. 'XML and JSON export') require a subscription to the 'premium' or 'enterprise' plans, even when self-hosting.
Also the free plan isn't the same as the Open Source edition, which doesn't have data limits.
Naming matters. If a company can't or won't use the agreed-upon-by-the-software-development-community terminology on how the project is operated, it's souring to me. I also wonder if they (the company) understand what Open Source "is," specifically the responsibility that inherently comes with having an Open Source development/product model. In that circumstance, it feels like they have come to understand Open Source in the same vein that society once understood phrenology[2].
[1] https://about.gitlab.com/company/stewardship/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology
The TechCrunch article classified you as full open source but this doesn’t seem accurate.
It’s ok to be proprietary and charge money for licenses. The confusion is when the label “open source” is used for non open source software.
I've seen an explosion of these types of companies cloning already popular tools and using open source as their primary differentiator
The Baserow usecase I most enjoy is currently a backend for a landing page -- I'm only scratching the surface but even that is pretty useful for me.
I've use both Baserow and NocoDB and they're both great but Baserow is certainly more polished UI wise -- it was lagging in features but they've both made strives since I did the active comparison. It looks like NocoDB generally leads Baserow but it feels more like a cathedral/bazaar situation to me -- both producing great software but with different tradeoffs.
Ask HN: Best low-/no-code solution for simple web-based database frontends