Hacker News Reader

Comment by phillmv | Hacker News Reader

Am I the only person to think that this is a patently ridiculous line of thinking?

I've talked in 2002 or 2003 to a guy who was still developing fro BeOS at the time. Better have a near monopoly on an uncommon OS than be some invisible me-too :)

The question is: is there a profitable long-term market in the Touchpad?

Who actually bought the device? Corporations who will commit to long term usage (I doubt it) or tech nerds who will flash the device to run Android (leading to a different, well-populated market) or tech nerds who will use the device as is (and abandon it in a year or two)?

Honestly, this sounds like very short-term thinking on the part of Palm.

Someone at work bought two, one each for his under 6-year old sons so they wouldn't fight over them. Don't see that as a long-term market.

I bought the device because I honestly believe that WebOS is an interesting take on a tablet OS (and I like it much better over Android). However I will not be purchasing any apps on the device. I use it strictly as an eReader.

When it comes to app sales, does it really have to be stable long-term? I thought app development was already generally a short-term gambit anyway.

Not necessarily. At least a couple of devs I personally know have made more money on WebOS than Android (none of them developed for iOS so no idea about that).

And add to that how much more enjoyable it is to develop for WebOS and you get a winner.

I'd bet US$150 on that.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com