Cities are tradeoffs. This particular municipal code may be a bit honerous but it's not exceptional in it's reasoning.
Cities are tradeoffs. This particular municipal code may be a bit honerous but it's not exceptional in it's reasoning.
Moving to a city involves some tradeoffs and concessions to public safety & general decorum, but generally giving up arbitrary rights shouldn't be one of those.
Having one car in what is effectively a driveway should not be an offense. In this case, it looks like you wouldn't be able to park on the street there anyway, so if you prevent them from keeping their car there, then there isn't really a better place to keep it. I am a big advocate of mass transit and cycling, but randomly taking people's cars away isn't a good idea.
Besides, even "amassing cars" probably isn't that bad as long as they aren't derelict and you're not setting up a commercial parking lot. One person in my neighborhood has at least 4 interesting ("classic"?) cars in their driveway that they keep covered and/or sparkling clean. I think it's silly to own so many cars, but it's hardly an eyesore or damaging to the local character.
Also don't forget to blame whatever jerk reported the family for this violation. Did they piss off a neighbor?
This would be a valid argument if all people were born outside of the city and have plenty of economic and social opportunities outside of cities.