California takes bold step to reduce truck pollution: Electric trucks
ww2.arb.ca.gov
ww2.arb.ca.gov
All trucks all ruin roads, which redirects public investment to constant road repairs, instead of renewables and the environment. Back in the 60s it was discovered that the wear of the road is the weight on an axle to the fourth power. https://www.insidescience.org/news/how-much-damage-do-heavy-...
So trucks, and especially heavy trucks disproportionally destroy roads. Roman roads remained usable for more than a 1000 years and yet modern roads can be destroyed in less than a decade using trucks.
So in addition to regulation like this road taxes for heavy vehicles must be increased. Perhaps a lower tax for electric vehicles could give a nice incentive for the transition.
Disincentivising trucking can reduce the repair costs, free resources for other important investment.
So many questions, none of which is answered by this frankly insane regulation.
From my brief time working for a logistics company, the rough "replacement" rule was 15 years or 2m miles to look at replacement, though this rule was not hard and fast and older trucks were running. Practically this means a lot of these kinds of trucks will be simply replaced on their schedule with newer electric models.
Whether California's power grid can handle it is an incredibly valid question, since the state seems to do rolling blackouts/brownouts every time there's a fire or an exceptionally hot day.
It actually seems quite weak; a slow requirement for manufacturers to start shipping zero emission trucks, and a requirement for fleet operators to report.