Comment by Dan_Sylveste | Hacker News Reader

Comment by Dan_Sylveste | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

>infra like k8s even under-the-hood for intermediaries (like web agencies) is still not always the norm

That's because 'the norm' for web agencies is a site that does basically zero traffic. If a company hires a 'web agency' that's by definition because the company's business model does not revolve around either a web property or app.

Whether that's a gas station company or a charity or whatever, the website is not key to their business success and won't be used by most customers apart from incidentally.

With that in mind most agencies know only how to implement a CMS and simple deployment perhaps using Cloudflare or a similar automated traffic handling system. They don't know anything about actual infrastructure that's capable of handling traffic, and why would they?

A lot of agencies are 100% nontechnical (i.e. purely designers) and use a MSP to configure their desktop environment and backups and a hosting agency to manage their deployed sites.

I very much agree with you. I must have been unnecessarily critical in my initial comment, I did not mean it as a rant, more like an observation about where-we're-at towards what seems an inevitable conclusion to me. Sorry that came out wrong, clearly I got carried away.

In asking if "Kubernetes is a red flag signalling premature optimisation", you correctly explain why we're yet on the "yes" side for the typical web agency category.

[Although FWIW I was hinting at a non-trivial category who should know better than not to setup a scale-ready infra for some potentially explosive clients; which is what we do in the entertainment industry for instance, by pooling resources (strong hint that k8s fits): we may not know which site will eventually be a massive hit, but we know x% of them will be, because we assess from the global demand side which is very predictable YoY. It's pretty much the same thing for all few-hits-but-big-hits industries (adjust for ad hoc cycles), and yes gov websites are typically part of those (you never know when a big head shares some domain that's going to get 1000x more hits over the next few days/weeks), it's unthinkable they're not designed to scale properly. Anyway, I'm ranting now ^^; ]

My unspoken contention was that eventually, we move to a world where k8s-like infra is the de facto norm for 99% of infrastructure out there, and on that road we move to the "no" side of the initial question for e.g. web agencies (meaning, we've moved one notch comparable to the move from old-school SysAdmin to DevOps maybe, you know those 10 years circa 2007-2018 or so).

[Sorry for a too-terse initial comment, I try not to be needlessly verbose on HN.]

>My unspoken contention was that eventually, we move to a world where k8s-like infra is the de facto norm for 99% of infrastructure out there, and on that road we move to the "no" side of the initial question for e.g. web agencies (meaning, we've moved one notch comparable to the move from old-school SysAdmin to DevOps maybe, you know those 10 years circa 2007-2018 or so).

This is very very hard to parse BTW. I don't want to reply to what you've written because I can't determine for sure what it is that you're saying.

Sorry, my bad. I'm tired, I shouldn't post.

Essentially I mean: scalable infra may be premature optimization today in a lot of cases, but eventually it becomes the norm for pretty much all systems.

You could similarly parse the early signs of a "devops" paradigm in the mid-2000's. I sure did see the inception of the paradigm we eventually reached by 2018 or so. Most of it would have been premature optimization back then, but ten-ish years later the landscape has changed such that a devops culture fits in many (most?) organizations. Devops being just one example of such historical shifts.

I anticipate the general k8s-like paradigm (generic abstractions on the dev side, a full 'DSL' so to speak, scalable on the ops side) will be a fit for many (most?) organizations by 2030 or so.

I hope that makes sense.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com