No such luck with this ridiculous software. An incoming train that any human (with normal sight) would have no problems to detect? The car drives right into it. You literally have to pay full attention during even the simplest of situations because there is no way to understand how this piece of software actually thinks, much less to predict how it will misbehave.
Today it's an incoming train that's painted white, tomorrow is a cricket on the road that causes it swerve onto oncoming traffic, or a small paint chip on a traffic sign that causes the OCR to read "speed limit 200" instead of 20.
To be fair, failing to yield to oncoming traffic when turning left is an extremely common mistake for human drivers to make as well.
In fact, earlier in the video, the car correctly yielded to an oncoming car, the human driver overrode it, then complained that the oncoming car "cut him off"! https://youtu.be/yxX4tDkSc_g?t=494
By taking away throttle control and steering, you leave yourself with only decision making. It's reducing major components of normal driving behavior. It's not perfect, but knowing its strengths and weaknesses allows for better driving in my opinion.
And before i hear a "That's exclusionary", yes, excluding people unable to be safe while driving 2 tons of steel launched at high speeds is a good thing
I'm a private pilot though and what you're describing sounds a lot like the autopilots on small planes. It handles keeping course and altitude for you, so you can focus on the rest of the flight and it is indeed way less taxing than hand flying a longer distance. And like Tesla, a plane autopilot will occasionally do something weird so you can't entirely ignore it. I would think the difference though is that in a plane, nothing the autopilot does will be fatal or dangerous very quickly, so you have plenty of time to notice and correct it as long as you aren't sleeping or something. When you're driving a car though, a second of steering in the wrong direction can quickly turn into an accident, so you as the driver have to be constantly ready to immediately take over. Even in the chance is low, as long as it's often enough to be a factor, you still need that instant readiness.
I wonder if the value is more on longer drives, as you said, vs city driving. The fatigue factor driving between cities is a bigger issue, and the driving tasks are simpler with less opportunity for the car to do something crazy than in busy city driving.
Assuming you know its strengths and weaknesses. See next post, below.
I'm wondering if "reducing major components of normal driving behavior" is such a good idea?
What I'm getting at-- the delusion/illusion that the brain/mind is somehow separate from the body-- that learning can all be in the abstract without any connection to tangible reality.
How can you make throttle decisions if you don't have throttle control? Wouldn't having throttle control at all times mean you have more awareness of the machine you are controlling and can thus decide faster and act better? Because this control is already part of your thoughts?
As others have said, I cannot fathom how having to babysit an occasionally suicidal driving system is better than having no system at all. It seems perfectly balanced at the absolutely worst point of both being reliable enough that you stop paying attention, but unreliable enough that it catches you not paying attention.
If an FSD system really let me sit and watch a movie or read or book or something -- if it was that good -- then I 100% get it and would be signed up. But one that you have to babysit seems worse than pointless.
As someone who has driven a Tesla 10s of thousands of km now and was driving for decades before, I disagree. I can see why you'd think that, however it's like a muscle that's been tight for years. You're so used to it, you don't noticr it anymore. Once it loosens, you're surprised how much better it feels.
They never, ever are. We do not enforce good driving except after people die (or even then, vehicular homicide has low sentences).
Of course there are cases the system doesn't work at all and is not well suited for surface roads very well.
Its behavior is very predictable and easy to feel when its seeing something I'm not. (Slowing down to match speed 1:1 with the car in front of me when they let off the gas is a common example)
If something happens suddenly in that range, you might not be able to brake in time even if you were driving at just 20 mph.
You might actually mean a longer distance?
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Safe-driving-distance-2-...
Once I let me guard down, was not paying attention, the road markings went missing annd the car almost ran straight into oncoming traffic.
It wasn't a Tesla but a similar thing.