Anonymous calls off outing of cartel after release of kidnapped member
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Is there any evidence that this is anything other than a big hoax orchestrated by Anonymous for publicity and/or lulz? Any third-party confirmation that any part of this story is true, or are we just basing everything off what Anonymous has told us?
I mean, any evidence that this unnamed guy was ever kidnapped, that he was ever released, or that Anonymous ever actually had any information about Los Zetas in the first place? Just wondering, not accusing anyone of lying, just not entirely confident that "Anonymous" is a trustworthy source.
The hostage returned with a message claiming that the kidnappers said any exposure of information resulting in the outing of a gangster would result in the demise of Anonymous 10-fold.
I.e. why would Anonymous tell themselves to shut up in such a convoluted way?
Where's the evidence that there ever was a hostage?
I'm sure that at least a few law enforcement officers may have felt less safe once their information was released, why wouldn't they return the favor?
Anyway, I agree that the story reads more like fiction than fact, I suppose only time will tell.
There is no "anonymous". Everyone is "anonymous".
Anon can't go head to head with a drug cartel, it's true, especially not on their terms. But let's not pretend that Anon was a paper tiger in all this.
(by this I don't mean that the claim by anonymous that they have information regarding the identity of Zeta members is a lie - I just mean that the information that they do have probably doesn't warrant a move such as the one you suggest)
It's amusing though, because they will still get credit for it, and that will further contribute to their mystique.
The Zetas actually released the guy? Wow!