He already abstracted over that by using efficiency.
>none of the math you did matters at all.
One would have expected an increase in coverage to increase efficiency by 10 vs sunlight which would have require explaining another factor 10 which could have been explained by e.g. saying that converting useless wavelengths into useful wavelengths increased efficiency by 10.
You're arguing that the things you have said do not increase efficiency. That is even more damning than a ridiculous efficiency gain.
The math that shows how much electricity must go in to have the equivalent amount of plants come out.
Watt per PPFD or something along those lines.
Vertical farming uses a lot of electricity.
>You need light coverage not heat wattage!
The 100x efficiency factor already implies that the plant can absorb heat for photosynthesis. None of that "heat wattage" is being wasted.