If you don't get that, maybe you missed something in your training
And yes it has everything to do with AI (not categories per se but the article)
If you don't get that, maybe you missed something in your training
And yes it has everything to do with AI (not categories per se but the article)
> And yes it has everything to do with AI
No, category theory is not about AI. My training was certainly sufficient for me to refute that connection, and the way you keep referring to my "training" rubs me the wrong way.
The classic schematic representation of X Y Z shown on the above wiki page is basically a crafting rule to create Z. That is, if the AI knows about a "path" (think back to your homotopy training) from X and Y to Z then it can craft a Z from X,Y if it needs to
Could you elaborate on this? What does it have to do with AI?
Categories are about composition. Crafting is also about composition - using inference rules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_theory
The classic schematic representation of X Y Z shown on the above wiki page is basically a crafting rule to create Z. That is, if the AI knows about a "path" (think back to your homotopy training) from X and Y to Z then it can craft a Z from X,Y if it needs to
Yes this is exactly reverse to how we normally think about the caller/callee relationship