List of social media alternatives
r.nf
r.nf
Easy to Say "reddit alternative" but really it might not have the zeitgeist quite right. "It depends".
* if you want the dialogue how well it does thread and nested comment management is key, and thread hiding
* if you don't like moderation you're going to be accepting doxx, pile-on, racism, trumping, trashtalk and trolling.
* if the owner marries a tennis superstar or starts a rocket company or sells NFT it's not worth it.
The list has "very reddit-like (red)" column though.
I think the title should be changed to reflect that.
@dang any input?
Usenet is an alternative because:
- no one own "the platform"
- anyone can have hes/shes own messages on a personal iron
That's is. An alternative is something different that do the same thing IMO, not a clone or almost a clone with just a different owner or dress.
>Reddit alternatives sorted by software
https://ramble.pw/f/RedditAlternatives/4041/reddit-alternati...
1) Far-right cesspool
2) Far-right cesspool
3) Far-right cesspool
4) Anti-trans "women's community"
5) Something actually decent
> Something actually decent
Which one is it?
> Which one is it?
The list linked is ordered, so if you count down to #5, you will find mstdn.social
I'm not sure what the other possible reasons are. Due to the network effects, you'd expect people to want to use the larger social media websites by default. And theses alternatives don't seem to offer anything special (except possibly having less censorship).
Seems to me that Reddit tolerates hating specific sorts of people and not others, so if you hate the sorts of people that Reddit doesn't want you to hate on their platform, then one of these other sites will allow you to hate those folks together with others who share your hatred. While if you hate the sort of people that Reddit thinks it's okay to hate, then you can find others to hate together with, without leaving Reddit.
On the other hand, it's easy to find communities on Reddit which have no hatred towards any other groups. The same cannot be said for the top four sites on this list.
Only catch is that you have to be invited to create an account.
Keeping the community small is probably a big factor in maintaining a high signal-to-noise ratio.
There are lots of great small subreddits. Occasionally, one will become popular and it will all start to fall apart. L'enfer, c'est les autres.
Its the "reality has a left leaning bias" and its being met with the same attempts to indoctrinate people towards hate. The only group of people who would feel quote 'persecuted' unquote are those who hold hateful and bigoted views.
I don't think theres anything majorly wrong with redditlikes/twitterlikes/federated mastadon sites. But the moment I see a random site telling me to use alternatives that only promote hateful views, I don't see it as valid. Regardless of the data used, sites like Gab shouldn't be given a spotlight since they refuse to even federate with other Mastadon servers.
I don't even want to get into how Gab is clearly a cesspool [1], the next two sites listed are 4chan twitter analogues, and the overite page is the terfs who were banned from reddit.
In this day and age, a reddit clone isn't the same as a digg clone. A reddit clone is mostly a "refuge" (rdrama being a great example counter to my terf/bigot point) for those who are banned from reddit. In reddits history, the only subreddits who get outright banned are those like /r/cringetopia /r/fatpeoplehate /r/thedonald
Communities that promote hate. And seeing such a clearly bad list on hacker news, I had to speak up.
[1]https://www.npr.org/2018/10/28/661532688/a-look-at-gab-the-f...