Publishing a few critical articles is not bullying and harassment.
Nitpicking over leaking bytes and language features every release is exhausting for the language author when we both know these will be fixed in another release.
The fact I see activity in language and that the author is active gives me confidence in V.
Which comments on this thread were Xe Iaso's?
> Nitpicking over leaking bytes and language features every release is exhausting for the language author when we both know these will be fixed in another release.
I don't know what will be fixed in another release. Nitpicking to you was useful to decide if V was worth my time now.
> The harassment is still continuing on this thread
I saw little or none. I understand it feels like harassment when someone believes their critics are conspiring and malicious.
> I saw little or none.
I've assumed you read the comments against V in this thread and it seems like you clearly haven't.
Also, you're not the person being harassed about memory leaks after the author said this was fixed already.
If the V person unblocks me and unbans me from the places I've been banned from (at least Twitter, GitHub and Discord), I'd be happy to add a disclaimer about the post being "out of date".
I want V to succeed because competition is good, but I also need to call out misleading statements for what they are.
Believe what you want, but I did not write those articles in an attempt to "smear" or "defame" V or its team. I regret writing these articles as they have created negativity and hate that is slung around like candy for no real reason. I have no plans to write anything about V on my blog in the future and this experience has taught me many things about how to write about programming languages in the future.
Try imagining someone can disagree with you.
> Also, you're not the person being harassed about memory leaks after the author said this was fixed already.
Disputing the author's claims is not harassment.