> If I had done the analysis in that blogpost (whose factual accuracy you corroborated) myself, I would have come to the same conclusion.
No, you would not even be able to reproduce those bugs, because they have been fixed.
> don't have major bugs that interfere with their primary value proposition (like in Vlang).
can you list such major bugs here please?
I had previously said: "if the author of that blog post found (IMO) straightforward ways to invalidate Vlang's claims in ~1 month with the language, I suspect that I will also find _other_ ways to also invalidate Vlang's claims in a straightforward manner."
Unfortunately, I don't have a month of spare time, like that blogger, to put towards that effort.
> can you list such major bugs here please?
It might be (though I doubt it) that the major bugs outlined in that blog post (which your community promptly fixed) happen to be the final set of such major bugs that interfere with Vlang's primary value proposition. Like I said, I'm not willing to put a month of spare time to find out.
I will almost certainly check back after some time (probably more than 1 year), and hopefully by then I will have the spare time to do the inspection, or someone else will have done it. I sincerely hope that you and your community succeed in achieving your goals! Good luck!
Then please don't spread the misinformation that V has "major bugs that interfere with their primary value proposition".