I think there's a valid conversation to have here regarding tuning solutions to fit a desired effectiveness target. An ideal solution that's circumvented 99% of the time can be worse than a mediocre solution that's circumvented 50% of the time when looking at the big picture.

Or, if you backed off certain regulations perhaps there could be 300 ships still with better conditions than all other ships. Far greater good overall.

What is the intersection where there becomes more bad ships and less good ships because we fail to see the tipping point?

Have we created a better situation or in our determination to be vastly superior in our regulatory manner have actually created more bad?