I mean you can get an even better deal if you just stole all your neighbour’s stuff, if price is all that matters. Let’s just make that legal, and to hell with the side effects.
Any discussion about regulations has to actually involve the regulations and what they are trying to achieve. Maybe some of these are overzealous? Maybe the way it was implemented was crap (one sided while allowing others to circumvent), etc.
Theft is not consensual, therefore it wouldn’t be legal in a laissez-faire regulatory environment. Worker exploitation also would be illegal, if the employer broke the terms of their agreement with the worker.
The Jones law cited in the article is about protecting local labour and manufacturing. Is that what we’re discussing or something else?
As such, it makes more sense to have an expectation of worker safety and that employees are not unnecessarily exposed to risks that are preventable and known to the employer.