Witness Moscow commuters not being able to enter their metro as Apple Pay cuts them off.
Witness the AML surveillance regime shutting out entire countries:
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2020/10/23/money-reimagined-...
Witness Moscow commuters not being able to enter their metro as Apple Pay cuts them off.
Witness the AML surveillance regime shutting out entire countries:
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2020/10/23/money-reimagined-...
Per your example, ok Apple Pay got cut off. Is the transit system going to support crypto? Will they be able to run their business and make that transition with regulators? It’s a drastic measure that cuts one off from the structures that they physically exist in, and unless those structures are overall crypto-supportive, they would just be putting themselves further between a rock and hard place (which as we’ve seen by the lack of serious business adoption, companies and orgs are not really willing to take that risk in any meaningful way)
Edit: I agree with your use of the term “regime” and am not arguing against the sentiment of your point. Just that I don’t think crypto actually has the backbone to solve it, there’s not enough physical-world tie in yet for it to have the leverage it needs to truly overcome the global financial regimes that are neck-deep in fiat and physical assets that actually impact everyday peoples’ lives.
That's the big question. But assuming for a moment that crypto can act as a substitute for traditional centralized payment systems, then it has significant advantages in some contexts over those systems.
Except that, fundamentally, distributed permission-less systems can't come close to the computational efficiency of centralized systems. So this is like "assuming perpetual motion machines existed, we could build a post-scarcity society" levels of assumption.
With zk-proofs, the redundancy of a blockchain can be significantly reduced without comprimising security. What redundancy remains provides the high process integrity that critical applications like financial transactions require.
It’s been around for a bit already, why is it not more widely adopted compared to BTC/ETH, any thoughts?
https://polynya.medium.com/rollups-data-availability-layers-...
zcash initially used zk-proofs only for privacy. It is only now looking to utilize it for scalability.