Setting the record straight: a eulogy for Bitcoin maximalism

I find Bitcoin fascinating and to be a really important technology development, but the culture that's evolved around it is a real turn off. I thought this was spot on:

"It’s clear that there’s an awful sickness pervading the Bitcoin space. Most Bitcoiners are normal, good people. For the vast majority of them, there’s no lifestyle associated with owning Bitcoin, as it should be. But there’s a subset of people — a small, flailing, shrinking group — who are mostly new to Bitcoin, made Bitcoin their entire personality, and became completely emotionally invested in it. They are spoonfed on a diet of the same half dozen thinkers, and suffer from an ideological monoculture. They cannot extricate themselves from their lifestyle/investment, and so when anyone in the tribe or adjacent says anything that remotely contradicts their established dogma"

> The ‘halving’ is moronic.

What does this mean, particularly in light of the earlier claim that

> its monetary and governance qualities are supreme

?