This is my first time running across V, and it looks like the HN community generally considers Vlang's claims misleading.
I found a factual (IMO) evaluation of Vlang's claims here: https://mawfig.github.io/2022/06/18/v-lang-in-2022.html#summ... . I've tried looking at your replies on the HN thread that discusses it, and what I gathered is that almost all of the deficiencies in that analysis are factually correct, but will be corrected in future, non-alpha, versions of Vlang.
Is that impression correct? If not, is there a centralized place where you debunk the claims? (I understand you're an open source contributor and might not have the time, but I'm just letting you know that I won't engage with the language further without seeing something like that).
If my impression was correct, I would like to say that I concur with the general HN sentiment that the state of the language is so immature/alpha as to really cast doubt on whether the list of claimed features will actually be achieved at some point in the future.