I see this frequently repeated, but it's clearly sophistry, similar to the language trick in a comment below where "It's not a baby, it's a fetus" is used to subvert reality.
Women can very well govern their own bodies, but a 6 month old baby is definitely not "their own body" and one can very well understand why large portions of society would want to see it protected against abuse.
This isn't a gendered issue, it's a worldview one. There's a very small skew towards males preferring it be illegal, but it's not enough to write off all opposition as male:
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opini...
Women favor legality by +28 percentage points
Men favor legality by +17 percentage points
That's...not a particularly small gender skew.
63 percent of women say abortion should be legal in all/most cases.
58 percent of men say abortion should be legal in all/most cases.
That's an ~5 percentage point gender gap, not a 10 percentage point gap.
I was thinking of it this way: Hallucinaut assumed that armitron was male, because a female would never make that argument. However, 46% of people who believe that abortion should be illegal in almost all cases are female, which makes Hallucinaut's assumption very bad.
Your approach is valid in other contexts, but I don't think it's the most relevant to the question I was addressing.
A fetus in the first or second trimester isn't capable of life outside the mother's womb. A vanishingly small percentage of people are even considering late-term abortions, but that's what you seem to be fixated on in all these threads.