They didn’t because the argument you are repeating is wrong, as well as made in bad faith to undermine obviously correct legal analysis.
You are a victim of propaganda and it makes me sad.
They didn’t because the argument you are repeating is wrong, as well as made in bad faith to undermine obviously correct legal analysis.
You are a victim of propaganda and it makes me sad.
For example, your second sentence here would have been fine on its own, or as the nucleus of a more thoughtful comment. The other sentences are the ones that break the guidelines. I understand that on a fraught topic like this, it can be next to impossible not to write such things. But then one should edit them out. That's what I do, or try to.
Edit: it looks like your comment history contains a fair bit of ideological battle. Please make sure you're not using HN primarily for that, because that's the line at which we ban accounts (regardless of which ideology is being battled, or battled for).
https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...