Did you follow the story? There are a lot of inconsistencies with what the women are saying. There is little doubt in my mind that they are lying.
Here is Glenn Beck explaining the charges (cause he's funnier than a translation of swedish court documents): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVt-WD-p950
Sending him to Sweden only makes sense if he will get a fair trial there. Based on the fact that this case hasn't been dropped, and the trial will be held in secret, there is a good chance that he may not.
That's a fine opinion, but when you visit another country you have to obey by its laws regardless of your opinion on them.
Basically, the case looks ridiculous, and the Swedish legal system as a whole probably isn't.
A UK court shouldn't be deciding the merits of a case based solely on press reports about the prosecution.
(For the sake of argument, please ignore the possibility of inhumane punishment, and just assume that the alleged criminal will be sent to a euro-style prison.)
Do you disagree with this statement? If so, why?
If they were accused of sluttiness while they were in Iran, by an Iranian citizen or two, then there might just be a case to answer. Like what happened to these two unfortunates: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7673046.stm