You make wild but unfortunately all too popular claims about the state of things at the time the Second Amendment and its prequels were written, going all the way to repeating a claim completely unsupported by history.
I suggested you read what these people actually said at the time to learn both the context and what they were intending to do, and you claim this is circular logic. Basically you're holding to your position that your side can just make shit up and no historical record is allowed to contradict it. Along with the usual insults and character assassination.
Guess what? We don't care what you say and will not take any of it into account in our future actions. There can be no peace between our peoples in our cold civil war, we'll have to see how it plays out.