Ask HN: Could GitHub Copilot be used as a form of supply chain attack?
As in, could you intentionally create public, vulnerable code that looks fine that then gets picked up and referenced in other projects?
But if they continue to ignore license terms I can see someone create repos with intentionally Copilot-incompatible licenses and watermark it so they can prove the license terms were violated.
And yeah, i can see that attack vector (for legal action) through licenses as well.