> I was fairly certain the sarcasm (or satire as I prefer to call it; sounds more intellectual) would be obvious.
I get that the author was being sarcastic, but I don't get what purpose they serve other than be obnoxious.
I get that the author was being sarcastic, but I don't get what purpose they serve other than be obnoxious.
Was the sarcasm the bit about the bracing, when the actual bug has nothing to do with the goto but instead is the missing post-increment (++)?
And the context here is that OpenBSD people were really mad about OpenSSL in the aftermath of Heartbleed. It was around this time they forked it into LibreSSL.