> world trade as we know it a recent invention
I'm going to be very bold here, and say thats almost entirely incorrect. Any empire in the last 2000 years has depended on global trade. Before empire, in the bronze age, there is evidence of international trade.
> it needs the rest of the world less and less.
If we ignore the part where its almost entirely untrue that the USA is becoming self sufficient(its not, there is a reason why the Dollar is the international trade currency), It needs the world to export to.
> Those shipping lines, which mainly benefit the rest of the world
[citation needed] ~14% of the entire economy is spent on imports: https://www.statista.com/statistics/259096/us-imports-as-a-p...
about 11% of GDP is tied to exports. (see previous link, fiddle to get exports.)
> All it takes for an end of shipping is for the US to stop protecting shipping lines
What shipping lines is it specifically protecting? Unless the ship is a US flag carrier, there is no legal obligation for the US to protect it.
The % of global trade using US based ships is three tenths of fuck all: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_merchant_navy_capacity...
according to the US's own stats its 0.6% of all global shipping:
https://www.bts.gov/content/number-and-size-us-flag-merchant...
The US stopped all that >60 years ago.
The things that stop global trade are disasters, wars, or weird autocracy fetishes (see expelling jews(middle ages), WWI, James I & Charles I being inept, north korea.) not "the natural order".