Anecdotally, I find that web search has been doing a much worse job of recognizing my query and presenting an SO result - which is why I personally use it less. Blogspam created from scraping SO has been completely pwning top results in Google and DDG(bing) and it’s really disheartening.

See for example “geeksforgeeks” and similar sites, which I find to be a poor and overly verbose resource, which now dominates the top position

I was asking myself similar questions after finding that the survey results bore little resemblance to what I've encountered in the US software industry in the last few years (I've been at it for decades). My first hunch is that the results say more about SO survey takers than about the actual software industry - similar to how various political polls (e.g. FoxNews, Politico) seem skewed towards the bias of the polling organization. My second hunch is that it's a big world, and I and my colleagues may just inhabit a bubble far from the center of the bell curve.

These days, the only time I drop into SO is when a "how do you do that again?" search yields a relevant-looking question asked within the last year or so. As often as not, the search leads me to a blog post or primary source (e.g. mozilla javascript documentation). But when I do make it to SO, I find that it's still a bustling community full of legitimate expert guidance.

Yes. Several parts to it.

1) My experience is greater. Many of the problems that I encountered before, I know how to solve.

2) I know what knowledge I'm looking for if I don't know the answer. Instead of searching for the problem I am having (and ending up on SO), I am searching for the specific part of the documentation that I need for solving the problem that I have.

3) I tend to bias to project specific knowledge now. The general pollution of search on Stack Overflow means that it is more productive to search Spring documentation or the project specific forums ( https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-kafka/discussions ) rather than Stack Overflow itself.

4) Stack Overflow content is having difficulty with the lack of curation of old answers and the deceased quality of people answering now. Finding an answer written in recent times with a few variations on "have you tried {x}?" without the material leading to how that suggestion was derived means that trying to apply the answer is shotgun "maybe this works" without an understanding for how it works or if that is the right solution.

4b) I try to avoid the "have you tried {x}" answers as that impacts the rate I grow my experience (and thus part 1) at. Likewise, in general, people who try the shotgun solutions (and I can see that in code reviews if they're not good about cleaning up (and they aren't) tend to continue to make the same type of errors again as they are following cookbook / paint by numbers approaches rather than understanding some basic food science or aesthetic theory.

I probably take more guidance from blog articles and GitHub issue comments than I do from StackOverflow. I think this started to happen for me around 2015/2016. I'm not sure though if that's a function of me requiring more niche/targeted guidance, or StackOverflow no longer capturing as much knowledge as it once did.

I can only talk about my personal experience:

- Documentation seems to have gotten way better overall.

- Github issues are often a good place to search for open/resolved problems.

- I've simply gotten better at reading and debugging code over time.

- There are often chat rooms for larger communities on Slack/Discord nowadays. You get a more fluent and direct form of communication there.

- I still sometimes reach for Stack Overflow. But it tends to be for things where I'm a total newbie.

I find that in recent years my best resources are official docs because that's where I find the "obvious" answers to the issue I'm having by not having previously read the docs. I also find lots of answers in gh issues (often unresolved) where I gain insight into what might be happening so I can come up with a solution. SO answers that I find useful are usually ones which link to related docs.

StackOverflow has become nearly useless because they don't mandate version numbers on questions and answers. I never start searches on SO and walk away empty handed probably 95% of the time I find my way there.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned so far is the community/moderation. Those who do "visit" frequently are quite the clique, much like Wikipedians, with many of the same kind of outcomes. I used to spend my time helping people on there several times a week but I've been put off.

That being said, unix.stackexchange.com, is great.

Absolutely. Two of the big reasons are improved understanding and problem solving skills on my part and improvements in the tech stack I use day to day making things more clear and covering more use cases cleanly.

The third is that I’ve come to recognize that the average quality of answers on SO is quite poor — while they technically serve as solutions to posted problems, they often come with big caveats… use of private/deprecated APIs, hackiness, and feature misuse abound.

As such when I use SO these days it’s usually not for wholesale solutions to problems but rather to add to a greater body of examples of APIs in action which I can then abstract and use as needed. It’s decent for this use case.

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow Guidelines. It is currently not accepting answers.

There always those really weird esoteric bugs that someone has already slogged through lots of trial and error to resolve. SO is great for those kinds of problems.

I can confirm. Also the technology used really counts: with Javascript I got weird error and there are no standard in the ecosystem so I found my self looking on Google and SO all the time. With Ruby, on the other hand, there are better documentation, no weird errors and everything seems so smooth that I visit StackOverflow just once a month. I have been working with JS for 3 years and just 1 year with Rub

Broadly, yes. It's been years since I asked a question, and for searching and finding an answer, github issues has replaced it.

Every time I search on stackoverflow it thinks I am a robot and wants me to solve a capture. My workaround is to use "site:stackoverflow.com" on some search search engine. But this definitely made me use SO way less.

I find myself using it equally much, but maybe in a different way. There are always times I find my self wanting to do something weird in a framework a specific framework or a language so I go see if there are already solutions out there. There are also times where I find an existing question but I’m not happy with the answers so I write my own after some research—which I would have hoped to have been able to skip—then my answer serves as a reference for the next time I need to do something similar (which may be as long as a year or two, so I won’t remember).

24 years experience here.

12 years old account on SO.

Haven't used SO for anything for past 7 years.

I stopped answering questions after their policy changed which states that you don't own your answers, they do.

I figured, what's the point in using SO if there's code beggars plaguing it and SO staff isn't taking proper steps to prevent it from happening so I stopped using it alltogether.

It's not the place it once was after it was ran over by horde of code plumbers who can't look for similar answers.

My SO usage decreased dramatically once I switched from a simple text editor (Sublime) to an IDE that can resolve symbols and drill down into their definitions.

A lot of my SO usage used to be just looking up API documentation/syntax (and SO would rank higher than the framework's own documentation) which I no longer need to do if I can just Cmd+Click into the symbol and see its internal implementation.

I believe that Stack Overflow belongs to a time when VCS was the exception rather than the rule, codebases were scattered across many different providers, discussions took place on dedicated channels or mailing lists, documentation was scarce and of poor quality, and tooling was limited to the most essential. All this added friction to any form of shared knowledge of being built by the general public.

I didn't start using SO till I had already been a professional programmer for 20+ years, so I have no idea how I might have used it had it existed when I was starting out.

After 35 years as a professional programmer, I find SO invaluable. I might not use it with any kind of regularity, but when I need the kind of thing SO delivers, SO delivers.

I used it a lot more when I wrote more JS. When writing Elixir I just read the docs or go look at source code.

It probably depends on the technology you are using. For example, the Android conceptual guides are very good, but the javadoc / references are abysmal. You simply can't get anything done without SO because its more authoritative than the Android javadoc.

I find this as well. Earlier in my career it was useful, but in the last bunch of years I rarely if ever am on SO, and if I am, I’m trying to contribute answers. Wouldn’t be surprised if the survey data is largely skewed to more junior people.

In the beginning I used SO a ton, both asking questions and using existing answers.

But now I can't remember the last time I visited SO and I stopped asking questions many years ago.

This is true even when learning new languages and other things.

That would be great. I work in a generalist type of field where learning new tools is part of the job so I am still googling the same stupid questions almost every day

Yeah, more or less, I still do come back to it when I'm picking up a new language or framework.

No, haha, I forgot the opposite of `include?` in Ruby yesterday and ended up on SO which promptly told me it was `exclude?`. Which I've known forever. Haha.