So we're suppose to provide 'research' if we downvote your 'hypothesis', but you can just toss it out there and expect us to take it serious without the same consideration.
I'm not arguing against downvoting if someone believes what I did is actually against hackernews if it truly is? My edit expresses how I would be grateful for anyone informed in the research to explain if they obviously disagree enough to downvote me. They would've likely read what I've read anyhow on the fungi & Alzheimer's research.