Valve’s Steam Deck makes a brilliant case against walled gardens
fastcompany.com
fastcompany.com
I'm in awe of how powerful and versatile the Steam Deck is.
First of all most modern games, and especially indies, run perfectly well on the device.
Then it can emulate almost anything with very little setup (using emudeck). Wanna play couch coop PSX games? Connect two controllers and your TV, change the controller order and that's it. It just works!
There is also a bunch of streaming options available for cloud gaming and streaming from PC/PS4/5. I've been using Chiaki for PS5 remote play, and it's great.
The cherry on top is that even if Steam Deck fails. It's still an awesome handheld PC that I'm sure will have a passionate community for a long time.
Had it been a walled garden, it would have lost almost all of its appeal. I also own a Switch and it feels so limiting and boring in comparison.
Really hope steam is successful here, will maybe buy it myself at some point.
Want proof? Go have a look at the reviews on the Discover Center, KDE's Flatpak UI. Almost every review now, by a very wide margin, is posted by someone with the default "Steam Deck User" name.
Probably a lot of people considering that gaming was the elephant in the room for why a lot of people were still using Windows.
It's the various multiplayer fads that really pose an issue. When an important part of your social life is trying the game of the day with a bunch of your friends, incompatibilities, delayed releases, and all of that really suck.
I see it more as separate device segment that linux could very well take over, like it has for phones and servers.
I have done some light programming on the deck and it's a pretty fun experience, but I personally won't switch just yet. For playing video games though, I'm all in.
But Valve can't make the deck fast enough, they've got a months-long waiting list. I think they've got a hit on their hands, at least if they can catch up with demand.
I also suspect the platform will find lots of uses other than gaming. It's just a really handy form factor, with lots of controls. Not that this does Valve any favors -- as the article says, there's likely little margin in the hardware.
I'm not an expert on the topic, and I might be wrong, but nothing I've ever seen suggests there is any animosity between any of the people working on these projects. This is easily a 'everyone wins' story :).
I wonder who is suggesting this animosity.
My only issue with protonis that too many folks are referring to proton without knowing about wine, which has caused some misunderstandings and misapplication of credit.
I'd like to see it mentioned somewhere prominently that proton relies on wine.
Steam deck hasn't hit Indian shores so there is a chance it would be here by the time deck 2 is released but oh boy, linux is in business now.
So the worry is that the Steam Deck is also going to be its own weird fork of Linux desktop, and fixes can't be used to improve Ubuntu/Fedora/Arch/etc.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrid_(application)
Newell said that there was a better chance that Valve would “disintegrate,” its independent-minded workers scattering, than that it would ever be sold.
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/09/technology/valve-a-video-...
The difference here between Valve and most all of the infamous tech buyouts of history is Valve has no VCs looking to cash out who get final say, or public investors looking to maximize returns.
When will it come to new territories and are there any plans to ramp up production?