I can understand when its based on your original work but this website reads more like basic questions posted on Stackoverflow. E.g. 'how to connect to a website with IPv6." Tell me he didn't just Google that and post the result. 0/10
I can understand when its based on your original work but this website reads more like basic questions posted on Stackoverflow. E.g. 'how to connect to a website with IPv6." Tell me he didn't just Google that and post the result. 0/10
Here's a query showing the 23 posts that link to StackOverflow, for example: https://til.simonwillison.net/tils?sql=select+*+from+til+whe...
And 41 where I credit someone on Twitter: https://til.simonwillison.net/tils?sql=select+*+from+til+whe...
More commonly I'll include a link from the TIL back to a GitHub Issue thread where I figured something out - those issue threads often link back to other sources.
For that IPv6 one: https://til.simonwillison.net/networking/http-ipv6
I had tried and failed to figure this out using Google searches in the past. I wrote that up after someone told me the answer in a private Slack conversation - saying who told me didn't feel appropriate there.
My goal with that page was to ensure that future people (including myself) who tried to find this with Google would get a better result!
(I'm a bit upset about this comment to be honest, because attributing people is something of a core value for me - the bookmarks on my blog have a "via" mechanism for exactly that reason: https://simonwillison.net/search/?type=blogmark )
I'm offended on your behalf! :)
So please, feel 100% free to ignore that person
Honestly I don't see a problem with the few posts I looked at. It's like recipes. You can't copyright recipes. At least it's not AI-generated blogspam, but a modicum of at least curating went in here.
This is the author's notebook, which happens to be public. It's okay.