It's complicated. Google is (for Cloud at least; couldn't say for certain regarding YouTube) already in the business of identifying certain "high-touch" customers where automatic downing of their service would be embarrassing to Google and so manual review happens. If YouTube doesn't already support that, adding it would be controversial ("Oh, they're playing favorites with content? Come and see the censorship inherent in the system! Help help I'm being repressed!"). If YouTube
does support it, Cornell may simply not have made the list yet because building and maintaining that list across millions of accounts is a hell of a cat-and-mouse game.
Google is rather heavily incentivized to try and automate as much as possible (and deal with the political blow-back when they stumble) instead of playing the cat-and-mouse game.
(As a fun thought experiment: ask yourself "If I were to design the algorithm that wouldn't have kicked Cornell off but would still auto-enforce the TOS, how would I do it?" And then ask yourself "If I were a malicious actor and the algorithm I designed were the one implemented, what kind of content could I create that the algorithm would fail to take down?").