Looks good - but I do not agree with
> 3. A semantic line break SHOULD NOT alter the intended meaning of the text.
That should be #1 MUST NOT
> 3. A semantic line break SHOULD NOT alter the intended meaning of the text.
That should be #1 MUST NOT
Adding a semantic line break inherently changes the relationship between words, and we can't always be sure about the intended meaning of text. If this were MUST NOT, then any modification would risk violating the spec.
Then again, this may be my own, idiosyncratic reading of RFC 2119. If you'd like to discuss this further, feel free to open an issue on the GitHub repo here: https://github.com/sembr/specification/issues