But then again, mental damage is intangible, right?
Since you can't experience other people's distress, your worst experience is always at the top of the scale on an individual level. You can use empathy and reason to understand other people's struggles, but your personal experience is unique in scale.
Consider that seemingly insignificant things can be very traumatic, and likewise major things (e.g. death) might not be traumatic at all.
That was maybe more glib than it should have been, and I am sympathetic to the desire to figure out who you are absent many of the normal meaning-making centers people used to have. Without that, there is only the identity supermarket. What's more, trauma-as-spectrum isn't the worst way to think about the aches of being a person. Maybe you weren't beaten as a child, maybe you didn't flee an invading army, but the pain and sadness lives on inside you nonetheless.
The darker side of it is that rolling around on the ground holding your tummy and crying is an efficient attention-getter.
So there's nuance. I think it's a serious idea, with serious consequences, and too many very unserious people have glommed onto it.
history is full of people with unhealthy behavior
it’s a new label for an age old problem
that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, it might just be part of the human condition
No doubt someone will claim this comment caused them trauma.