Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
The operation is just too slick from a business POV. As someone familiar with SaaS or in general this kind of recurring business model, you can sense all the little operational policies and procedures designed to increase your LTV.
It's a well-oiled machine. Without fail, the hygienist recommends cleaning not once every 12 months or even every 6 months, but every 3 months. When pressed on why, eventually they'll admit it's how nice it feels to have clean teeth and how important your smile is - but NOT strictly necessary for health.
This particular dentist also will shut down and take their entire staff to a resort for a week every winter if the team "hit their targets" for the prior year. That's the literal phrase they used to explain the trip. When I asked what those targets were, the person turned bright red.
So dentistry has a trifecta of factors that will encourage dark-patterns: (1) a true health-related reason for going both preventatively and to deal with problems; (2) a cosmetic / vanity-related reason (white teeth), and (3) the air of higher-educated medical authority.
Wrap that all in a lucrative recurring business model and of course it's going to lead to people taking advantage or at least overpaying for what they really need.
Just writing all this out made me realize I shouldn't be going to my current dentist! Thanks OP. :)
(Source: a couple of my close friends are dentists and suggested this strategy.)
My old childhood dentist used to do the absolutely necessary. He just cared about keeping my teeth healthy and not putting me under unnecessary stress. He did not even remove my wisdom teeth. When he retired the new doc would simply maximize the amount of procedures. One routine checkup and he would find ten things that needed to be done.
What had changed? In Germany doctors used to be basically paid from a fixed budged. In 2007 there was a health care reform changing that. Now they would be paid for individual procedures. So obviously doctors would try to do as much profitable procedures as possibles.
The articles misses the target a bit, probably because health care in the US has been run like a business for much longer so it is harder to see the real issue: It is not cultural, it is not some dentists being shady and it can not be fixed by educating dentists. It it the natural result of the incentives that are in place.
If you try to run health care like a business you will necessarily and always produce these issues. And this is not dentist specific. Lot's of unnecessary but profitable surgeries are being performed as well.
However, if you have a "flat fee" dentist/doctor you could be now encouraging the opposite - do the minimum work necessary to get done with the day. It's hard to legislate "be a caring, honest professional" but we can at least remove some of the incentives to not be.
Fixed budget for what? A patient or a case?
I'm old now, still have those teeth, and they are the healthiest teeth in my mouth.
If you want to keep your teeth,
1. get an electric toothbrush
2. brush for the full 2 minutes, twice a day
3. floss twice a day, gently (overdoing it will erode the teeth)
4. run one of those rubber pointy tools (gently) around the gum line twice a day
Take a look at people 60 and up. Most have false teeth. Do 1..4, your old self will thank you.
There is this idea that the only thing you need for good oral health is to simply do the maintenance. This couldn't be further from the the truth, and an honest dentist will tell you so.
There are plenty of folks that take exceptional care of their teeth, yet still have issues and there are plenty of folks that don't take care of their teeth the way their dentist recommends and still have healthy teeth. Genetics plays a massive role in oral health and this has been known at least since I have been a kid (almost 40 now).
I'm fairly lucky to be in my 40s with all my wisdom teeth intact and zero cavities, in spite of not flossing, never seeing a dentist, and only brushing once a day with a plain toothbrush. That is clearly genetic, since out of my entire immediate family, one sister has had one cavity and that is it for all 6 of us.
But we've always lived in first-world cities with fluoride in the water. My ex-wife had impeccable dental health for a long time until she did a military deployment to Djibouti for 12 months, and came back with 8 cavities. In the 15 years since then, she's never gotten another.
My favorite "reason" for why they should come out was, "you're more likely to bite your cheeks."
My current dentist is ambivalent about it.
Flossing once per day is plenty.
You also need not use a 'rubber pointy thing' - proper flossing goes just below the gum line and will get everything you need removed.
Super agree that you should get an electric, though. Heck, I switched from an oral-b to a phillips sonicare and my staining improved enormously, but that's really just cosmetic. ymmv.
The bacteria colonies re-establish themselves after 12 hours. I can also vouch for much better state of my gums when flossing twice a day.
> You also need not use a 'rubber pointy thing' - proper flossing goes just below the gum line and will get everything you need removed.
The rubber pointy thing gets in places the floss doesn't. I know this from experience. Pockets develop that the floss doesn't get in.
BTW, if you're young it's easy to dismiss all this advice. It takes decades for poor dental hygiene to catch up with one.
Bacterial colonies.
What techniques are most helpful? I see plenty of armchair mouth experts (I, myself almost spoke up, too), but I'd like to give space to someone who went to school for this stuff.
Also, I'm intrigued by the rubber pointy tools. Are those the gum stimulators with replaceable tips?
If I eat certain things my teeth feel so much cleaner at the end of the day then other things. I do not believe that is not a very big factor.
I've had a dentist comment on how he wished he had so few issues.
I brush like once a day just for hygiene/bad breath or whatnot, and that's pretty much it.
Without the sugars and starches, the bacteria that would cause cavities just don't cause cavities.
Sometimes they can give a proper reason. Like in my example I've got some largish gum pockets around three of my teeth that are getting better but still not great (was a lot worse before they did some deep cleaning 9 months ago, I was seriously worried I had a couple of abscesses, lots of pain, gum swelling, and bleeding), so every 3 months makes sense to check in on them and keep them cleared out enough they can heal better.
My gums also generally feel a lot better now, except for some periodic issues with the two 5mm gap teeth. Like it's pretty obvious to me that they're better. It used to be painful just to lightly brush some of those places that aren't now, and bleeding is a lot less common, and swelling is way down.
The Tepe brushes look interesting though, I might have to give those a try.
Caveat: I have a couple of “Cadillac” dental insurance plans due to great employee benefit packages for both me and my wife. So they cover quite a bit.
I just tell the hygienist before I get in the chair that if my insurance doesn’t cover it, I won’t be doing it, and don’t even suggest it. Generally that stops the upselling.
dentistry, optometry, therapy, veterinary, and even primary care all are vulnerable to the "recurring revenue" model. it's reasonable to be skeptical of their motivations even as we go to them for help and care. that's why patients should view medical professionals as an informed but biased opinion, not an authority. the patient needs to become knowledgeable about their own malady to make the best medical decisions they can, and it's part of the professional's job to aid that journey, not to make the decisions for the patient. that's also why patients need to see multiple professionals to triangulate their best option, rather than getting locked in to a single care provider. monopoly forces are antithetical to this process.
the shaman strategy is alive and well, and will be for many centuries/millenia to come (in other words, we're not uniquely advanced in the history of humanity).
What does happen is that if you buy a new pair even with the same exact prescription, the fact that it's new and clean and not bent in anyway will make it look much clearer. So that can trick people into thinking they need yearly new glasses.
A good optometrist will tell you when your prescription has stopped changing and when they expect it to start changing again (usually in your 40s).
note, that's not to advocate the other extreme of never trusting anyone about anything, but every decision is a trade-off and has drawbacks. the visual acuity afforded by glasses should clearly outweigh the downsides, rather than outsourcing your brain to a hammer-wielding optometrist.
[0]: i still have dry-eye from an eye infection that was likely caused by contacts. that was actually the impetus for getting rid of corrective lenses altogether and the subsequent realization that i didn't need them in the first place.
A couple years ago I had one recommend putting on a crown on a back molar. I asked why b/c I had no pain and they couldn’t really explain. Every other dentist I’ve been to since never brought it up again.
At the moment, I go to a new dentist every 6 mos. to a year because I can’t find one that doesn’t feel like one step above a used car salesman.
Final note, get a SonicCare. Dental friend (sadly in another state) says those things changed dentistry/brushing/teeth cleanliness.
I had a dentist one time that had a different car for every day of the week. I left them after only a few visits.
Dentistry is practiced as a business focused on maximizing revenue. Dentists are routinely coached to deploy sales tactics to increase their treatment acceptance beyond what is needed. If you walk into a dental office, you need to protect yourself from being abused. A second opinion unfortunately puts you in the same position, but now with a new dentist who will play into the narrative of only needing to monitor your condition for a while.
The business of dentistry is unfortunately antithetical to conservative treatment, which is almost always in the interest of the patient, because it results in significantly lower patient lifetime value.
Anyway, I was around 15 or 16 and had always had perfect dental checkups. One day I had another routine checkup, but now suddenly I had to get nine fillings. I asked my parents to get a second opinion, but they refused and I got the fillings. In a move that would surprise absolutely nobody, that dentist sold the practice a few months later. I'm 100% confident that he was just goosing his revenue to increase the sales price, or make it a more attractive acquisition based on the revenue trend. That was around 20 years ago and I haven't had a single other dental issue beyond getting my wisdom teeth removed a few years later.
I think dental care is super important, but dentists are concerned primarily with maximizing their revenue in a way that would get most physicians' licenses revoked.
I haven't tried to sue the guy, but I think seriously about firebombing his office every time I drive by it.
This isn't entirely unfounded. There are real concerns over replacing MDs with mid-levels with much less training. The AMA is significantly to blame for the switch, but as a general rule I won't see PA/NPs for anything beyond prescription refills or something like that.
When I moved to the States (Oregon) for a few years, I had to hunt for a number of services, with dentistry being one of them. I worked for a pretty large SaaS private (at the time) company, so the perks were plentiful, but most importantly, private insurance was up there in terms of quality.
Now, I'm originally from Canada, and without getting into the differences in healthcare between the two countries, but the amount of discrepancies I also received, let alone front-desk saying "oh my goodness, your insurance is incredibly good!", usually always resulted in the dentist informing me that I have 12 cavities.
The sad thing was in shopping around, and going to a number of different places to try them out, all ranged between 12 and 6 cavities, some even suggesting major dental work (2 crowns) required. I even went to 'work colleagues' recommended ones. All gave shocking details about my teeth.
Depressed, and annoyed, I went back to Canada, saw my dentist (and got a second opinion from a 3rd-party as an A/B test), and had 0 cavities to report. The second opinion stated I also had 0 (with maybe 1 on the way, and if I wanted, could opt to have it addressed now, but not the end of the world).
In the end it was cheaper (in almost every way, sadly) to see the Dentist on trips back to Canada, instead of opting for what would effectively have been the decimation of my teeth in the States.
I mean, on paper, there isn’t much of a difference between the two countries when it comes to dentistry.
Dentistry is private in Canada, the same as it is in the US. Coverage is via private plans, and dentists will goose insurance charges just the same.
All dentists running practice are suggesting way more expensive approaches, the last and cheapest one is actually from a dentistry university, where the professor seems more interested in studying the case instead of doing a quick surgery with huge costs.
If my experience is as ubiquitous as I suspect, there seems to be a perverse incentive among dentists to allow adults to ruin their own teeth. It's convenient because most people know extremely little about dental health beyond brushing and flossing. A minor carie on the enamel doesn't necessarily progress further than surface damage, and in some cases can even be reversed. Instead of saving the patient time and money by waiting for further progression of a carie, many dentists see the tiniest surface divot as an opportunity to drill n' fill. A more appropriate response would be to suggest the patient eat an appropriate diet that doesn't feed carie-causing bacteria and to come back in 6 months to a year for a follow-up; if the carie is visibly worse, then now it's time to consider drilling.
In defense of dentists, I imagine so few adult patients are compliant with suggestions of lifestyle changes that they figure it's hopeless and they might as well be the ones to cash in on cavities rather than some other dentist. Everyone hates going to them and they know they can't win.
(I might drink coffee slightly faster than I used to. I do not drink soda. I'm fine with stains but not unnecessary tooth decay.)
If you read the thread, some dentists will perform needless work on healthy teeth to make money, so I doubt there’s an incentive to let adults ruin their teeth when you can just lie and say they need the work anyways.
EDIT: Mine is actually in a very wealthy neighborhood and the lady who runs the practice (I think that's how it works?) has a reputation for buying state-of-the art tech.
The problem is their businesses can’t compete with the ones that play the insurance game. Insurance reimbursement rates haven’t kept up with overhead and so conservative dentistry is losing marketshare to ones willing to push treatment. We know multiple dentists that have filed bankruptcy in the last couple years.
Keep in mind that many people are very reluctant to pay out of pocket for dentistry. Until insurance reimbursement rates favor conservative dentistry, nothing will change. More responsible dentists will lose their practices or turn to over treatment.
Maybe the HN crowd wisdom has some ideas on how we can improve this situation.
Isn't this the case with other healthcare providers too, and not necessarily just dentists? For example, physicians will regularly make you wait at least 15 minutes—even in an empty office—so they can bill insurance for that extra time. They'll bill patients for "emotional/grief counseling" and lots of other unrelated charge codes as well. I've seen from firsthand experience how doctors will exploit patients and try to milk as much money as they can from them, rather than prioritizing their wellbeing and health.
But while medical upcoding fleeces patients, providers often feel it victimless because the procedures are almost always diagnostic and confused providers believe them to be paid by some third party (insurance, the state, but surely not the patient).
Dentists, in contrast, don't just upcode diagnostics, they systematically over treat their patients.
All medicine is practiced as a revenue maximizing business (or it would cease as an ongoing concern). It's easier to see this in dentistry since at some early point in the US the field/cartel opted out of many of the omnibus health payment plans that otherwise obfuscate value chains. Aside from the notable exception of tobacco cessation, disease prevention gets short shrift compared to intervention. This is slowly changing but has started from a tremendous deficit.
I used to know a few dentists. One was a conservative, family dentist with a small home office in a small home (and a mountain of savings). He had a good rep bc he earned it. The other two had a bit more extravagant lives, and they earned it through specialization (and in my opinion, probably a little bit of this article).
What consumers should be most concerned about is the end of family practices, and the start of corporate 1800-DENTIST/Supercuts for dentists. Issues like this article are the norm, and instead of a local dentist to seek resolution with, you’re doing the equivalent of filing a Jira ticket with a faceless insurance conglomerate.
This is the trend the industry is going bc of the costs and difficulty of owning a practice. If you can, I recommend finding a young dentist who has recently bought into a home office partnership, and stick with them until corporate dentistry takes over. It is the only way to consistently avoid situations like this article.
At the time a had a small tooth ache so I was planning to visit a dentist to check it. I was living in Switzerland, where dentist costs are very high, but I was about to go on holiday to Tenerife, where prices are much lower. So I checked on the Internet and chose the dentist with the best reviews near my holiday resort. When I was there and had explained my problem, the dentist said he'd like to do a full check of my teeth. He did that with a little camera so I could see my teeth on a screen as well. Next he went past all my fillings. I had quite a few of them, and for every one of them his comment was the same: 'decay'. He said they were old, or didn't fit properly, so around the edges decay had started. And indeed the image on the screen showed some brown edges. In the end he offered to replace all of them with some modern alternative. The treatment would cost a couple of thousand euro and would take my entire holiday week.
I didn't entirely trust him so I said I needed some time to think about it. Back in Switzerland I went to my usual dentist. I didn't tell him about the Tenerife episode but just explained about my complaint and asked him to check. He concluded that there was not really any problem, it might be my gum was infected and this gave me some pain. Then I told him the diagnose of his colleague in Tenerife. I expected that he would be shocked but he wasn't: he asked how much the guy was charging and just said it wasn't a bad price.
I then told the story to a friend whose both parents were dentists. He wasn't surprised either and he explained like this: he said dentists were like car mechanics. When a car mechanic is checking your engine and some parts were a bit worn out, some would say they should be replaced, but others would say they are still working so let's only replace them when they break.
It's 5 years later and all those 'decayed' fillings haven't given me any problem so far. But maybe I was just lucky? I'm completely confused now.
I called around a bit more, and then another dentist said she had no time but she was on duty that night in the ER. Said I could just pop by in the hospital somewhere after midnight and she would have a look. In five minutes my tooth was glued together again. I paid 40 euro in cash and that was that.
I don't know whether this is a generally-held attitude in the profession.
My dad had a benefit fund through his union and because his dentist knew how to milk the program, he ended up with a lot of unpleasant and unnecessary dental work. You see it a lot with telephone company employees, fire fighters, etc.
So, unless a filling is already on the verge of failing, replacing them is mostly a matter of personal preference and scheduling.
You can even take it further back. How many of those fillings were truly necessary at the time?
I am based in the UK, but ended up seeing dentists in Spain and Dubai who were both alarmed by stuff that the UK dentist was letting slide. Maintenece issues similar to yours.
I ended up having most of my fillings replaced at half the cost of the UK work, and have had a problem free 2/3 years.
You pays your money and takes your chances, but I prefer the approach of jumping on any issues early in my ear against too many sweets and fizzy drinks!
they are not more or less moral than rest of population, spread is the same as in all other professions, so experience vary
My wisdom teeth grew in about 15 years ago and have sat comfortably behind my molars since.
I saw a new dentist for a routine cleaning “intro package” where she suggested that I have the wisdom teeth removed. I asked her why should I have a surgery for this since I never had problems with them. She said it was a good idea because they were “more likely to develop a cavity” because they are farther back and harder to brush.
So basically she was pushing me pay thousands of dollars to have a serious surgery to avoid the risk of developing a cavity because I might not know how to brush teeth that I have had for 15 years and never had a cavity on.
I wonder how many people just decide “guess I need this surgery”
I went to the doctors once for a mild injury, one side of my palm was somewhat numb.
Despite informing me it wasn't very worrisome, they decided a I needed to be referred to a physical therapist, who then tried to put my hand in a cast and set up a dozen extra appointments for an injury that healed the week after the first. Since them I just haven't bothered seeing a doctor unless I feel like I'm immediate or near immediate danger.
This is the strategy Taleb advocates.
That's not because you don't know how to brush teeth, it's because it is physically hard to reach them. Sometimes even impossible, because part of tooth is hidden beneath gum.
Should have taken the money I would have spent on it 20 years ago and invested it in APPL, tho, because an APPL a day would keep the dentist away.
The root canal itself was quick, relatively painless, and not super expensive after insurance. But he couldn't do a crown, apparently that's only a dentist thing. Since my previous dentist closed his office, I asked for a recommendation and he gave me a referral.
The referred dentist did the crown just fine but the price gave me sticker shock: about 4x as much as the root canal itself, after insurance! It basically wiped out my HSA account for the year. When I went back for a general checkup and cleaning, the same dentist said they found SEVEN cavities. Which was a little mind-blowing since in the decade previous, my old dentist only filled ONE cavity and always complimented me on the state of my teeth.
I asked how much it would cost out-of-pocket to address the cavities and they gave a number somewhat north of $200. Oh, that's not so bad to have a bunch of cavities filled. Oh sorry, nope, that's the price PER CAVITY. I asked what I was doing wrong because I _had_ been flossing and brushing every day and got a very hand-wavy answer. I was in a literal state of shock so made an excuse about my schedule being full for the next couple weeks and beat a hasty retreat. After the root canal and crown, I literally couldn't afford to have seven cavities filled.
Fast forward a year and I finally find another dentist for a cleaning and evaluation and to tackle at least the worst of those seven cavities. You want to know how many cavities he found? None. None at all.
Eventually the teeth got so bad they had to be removed, and had to get two bridges put in. That was quoted at $6k apiece. At that point I did have a good job again and could afford it, but yeah, that hurt.
Since then one of the teeth in the bridge had to have a root canal, and then the top part of the tooth cracked when the root canal was checked, and so now I need to replace the anchor teeth in one bridge to 2 implants. I was quoted $7k for those (that's one of the cheaper quotes, I've also been quoted over $10k), not including a new bridge that will have to be made, which will be another ~$6k.
I've put that off for three years now (even had a scheduled surgery to start the process I ended up cancelling). My bridge just has a good amount of temporary cement over that cracked tooth, which has oddly stayed in place the whole pandemic. Eventually I'll have to get it done, but I'm putting it off as long as possible.
If I had somehow figured out how to get those crowns in the first place, I might have saved all this grief and extra expense after. I'm up to 3 removed teeth and 4 teeth stripped of their enamel to become anchor teeth to put the two bridges on, which can never just be 'normal teeth' again.
I've also since heard that some places have machines to 3D print crowns onsite and can do it for as little as $300 each. I wish I knew that was a thing before I decided I was too poor to afford proper dental care.
I discovered this last year when I went to a new dentist and they recommended two CEREC crowns and a laser gum cleaning at a total cost of around $2000. This was surprising, because I thought my dental insurance was pretty good. Turns out, it is: the dentist was just electing to use more expensive methods that weren't covered by insurance and failed to tell me about the options. I did some research later and found that the laser cleaning was not demonstrably better than the traditional approach in terms of outcomes (though I think the gums are supposed to heal faster) and was not endorsed by the periodontist professional society. I saw some sources which said that the same-day CEREC crown is actually worse than the lab-made crown in terms of fit and durability.
This immediately caused suspicion. So we started looking for a second opinion. We got a referral from a friend to a dentist that was more conservative. So she made and appointment with him and wouldn't ya know, ZERO cavities. Not even any "watch" areas.
Turns out this conservative dentist used to teach dentistry at the local state university and actually taught the overtreatment dentist. His response when he found out who said she had 9 cavities was "he was a very ambitious student".
We've been going to him for 15 years now and she hasn't had a single cavity, and he fixed her crown perfectly.
Sorry for the all caps, but YOU HAVE TO NEGOTIATE PRICES! $200+ per filling is an ASKING PRICE. You counteroffer at $75/per filling. Maybe meet at $90/each.
IF YOU DO NOT NEGOTIATE PRICES YOU WILL BE CHEATED!
"I'll fill two of them"
"Ok, how about five?"
Yes, I know they're talking about haggling on price, but it's more amusing this way.
But I saw a quote from a dentist who wanted to charge some woman $260 per filling for 4 fillings.
Who pays $260 per filling? That is a crazy price. $1,040 for an hours work? You have to put your foot down.
Malpractice would be if you had no evidence of a caries (exploratory, radiographic or other test) and you recommended a procedure anyway. That may have been the case, but usually they have varying opinions of whether a particular lucency on an x-ray representes a caries, or whether it should be filled. Or there is also a machine that is used to detect caries that are not always radiographically evident. So your dentist probably could claim it was there but other dentists wouldn't recommend filling until there was more evidence of a problem.
Until the governing bodies or associations dictate what the go/no-go criteria are for filling, the dentists will have wide leeway to convince you either way.
In all seriousness, fraud is rampant, and cash pay or low regulation fields like dentistry can easily take advantage of patients and their health literacy.
In ophthalmology, you hear of “laser” cataract surgery, “floaterectomies”, telling patients they need cataract surgery well before they are symptomatic, dry eye treatments.
Hell, in cardiology there have been multiple cases of fraud uncovered where doctors were putting pacemakers and defibrillators in people that didn’t even need them!
Maybe I’m jaded, but when there exists such a profit incentive, we as healthcare providers struggle to “do no harm”. I’m lucky to be surrounded by mentors and other doctors that try and exemplify the moral behavior patients expect in healthcare, but imagine if I had a mentor early on like Dr Lund in the article..
Is it not? I have commented before about the work of Dr David Burns[1], and one thing he drills over and over is that therapists need to start measuring their work, and it is easy, and they don't because they either don't want to hear that they are doing a bad job or they depend on their clients for long term income and so aren't incentivised to want improvement. He endorses a mood survey[2] which the patient/client fills in at the start and end of every session. If the patient self-reports "I feel 5/5 hopeless" and two sessions later they report "I feel 2/5 hopeless", isn't that a measurable improvment? if instead they say "I still feel 5/5 hopeless" isnt' that a measurable lack of improvment?
It isn't an objective quantification but if the reason for seeking help is self-reported bad feelings, and afterwards the bad feelings are reduced or gone, the evidence for improvement is at least as strong as the original evidence of a problem existing. And it's easy to find out if the bad feelings are reduced or gone by asking. See some examples in the podcast summary here[3] talking about studying the effectiveness of the therapy app they are working on: "two groups, including 60 participants with moderate to extremely severe depression at the start of the day, and 73 participants with no or only mild feelings of depression. [...] The reductions in depression in both groups, as well as the additional six negative feelings, were substantially greater than the reductions reported in large numbers of published outcome studies with cognitive therapy, other schools of therapy, and antidepressants. All seven types of feelings were dramatically reduced in both groups. For example, the depression reduction was 62% and 51% in the severe and mild groups, respectively, and the anger reduction was 70% and 81%, respectively"
and
"The feedback we received on the app has been largely totally unexpected. Some things that we thought were blow-away were criticized, and some parts that we thought were weak were strongly celebrated. This experience has been much like using David’s feedback scales in therapy. Therapists learn that their perceptions of how their patient feel are often not[?] off-base, and that many of your favorite techniques and strategies are not effective. This information, if processed with respect and humility, can transform your clinical practice."
[1] Dr Burns does the Feeling Good podcast ( https://feelinggood.com/list-of-feeling-good-podcasts/ ) and book, is a retired Professor from Stanford Uni, was a pioneer in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, and now works promoting his TEAMS CBT model which has insights on how to hone in quickly on the reasons people are stuck and can't change, and then how to get past that.
[2] One of the mood surveys https://feelinggood.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/brief-moo...
[3] https://feelinggood.com/2022/02/28/the-feeling-good-app-part...
With emotional dysregulation or trauma, which comes in many varieties and is more common than people realize, the path towards healing often involves someone feeling "worse" at first as they begin to face pain and emotions that have been suppressed
Someone who hasn't yet overcome their biggest difficulties won't have deep insight into their various psychological states and frames of mind. Without proper guidance, attempts to measure what's going on and assess progress can cause confusion and frustration. Especially if they aren't receiving helpful treatment, which is unfortunately far too common.
I think there is potential for measurement to help, but it's a difficult thing to do well.
This is all simply an aspect of the more general issue of how psychology and psychiatry are not well-developed areas of practice. Humanity is still learning how to effectively approach these problems.
So, there are dentists who aren’t in it just for the money. It is anecdotal, but so is the article. For that matter, the bad dentist was caught by a good dentist.
Also, I miss my dad.
I strongly suspect it leans toward the former though, as even a small town will have multiple dentists, and many of the rural dental offices are basically hereditary.
However, this whole thing would be more informative and impressive if they had gone after the elephant in the room. Aspen Dental overtreats more than the rest of the dentists in USA put together. They are a "large health-care organization with substantial oversight... and standardized treatment regimens", but that oversight and standardization is geared entirely toward convincing every patient to get at least ten crowns. Aspen Dental are also large enough to hire lots of lawyers, so Atlantic isn't going to touch that with a ten-foot pole.
- Using flouride toothpaste.
- Using a combo of bad-bacteria-killing mouthwash and flouride mouthwash (especially before bed).
- Eating or finishing meals with tooth-protective foods.
- Chewing xylitol [0] gum or mints. Xylitol is a sugar-replacement (with a lower insulin response) found in plants . I think Epic Dental has the most reasonably priced stuff that I would trust.
Her routine is here [1]. I think her suggestions are reasonable. She has a product line, but you can use generic products that fit her guidelines. Just match up the ingredients.
Also, a couple good points in the book Breath by James Nestor:
- We have malformed mouths and teeth because we don't do enough serious chewing. Think bread/mac and cheese/peanut butter vs carrots/steak/celery.
- Mouth breathing is bad. Your mouth dries out and this assists tooth problems. You can solve this while sleeping by taping your lips together.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xylitol
[1]: https://issuu.com/zellies/docs/zellies-cmcsbooklet?mode=wind...
This has been transformative for me. I wish I could hand one to my 6 year old self.
They are cheap and you can use them in the shower.
Uh...what? Nobody is going to do that.
1. avoid as much sugar as possible
2. [deleted]
I just checked, and neither of the mouthwashes I use have Corsodyl as active or inactive ingredients.
Also, uh, don't drink your mouthwash, spit it out.
Since everything we do has tradeoffs, I'm okay with using an antiseptic that is spit then rinsed (per the routine) if I'm going to eat ice cream and bread.
Your mouth has it's own floura. Sure you can blast everything away but eventually you'll be far more securable to some alcohol (or whatever antiseptic) resistant bad bug and you will get very sick for a very long time.
doesn't cut it for me. someone I know who doesn't smoke or drink and was sub-40 years old got diagnosed with tongue cancer. Cancer specialists were miffed at the cause. The only thing that stood out: he was a meticulous user of mouthwash 3x a day since he was a teenager.
https://www.primallifeorganics.com/blogs/primal-life-organic... (The Neurotoxin Lurking in Medicine Cabinets Around the Globe)
https://origins.osu.edu/article/toxic-treatment-fluorides-tr... (Fluoride's Transformation from Industrial Waste to Public Health Miracle)
I just had my yearly checkup and the dentist again noticed few small inactive cavities and said we should just monitor them like last year.
And almost every private tooth health insurance covers those anyway, so if you have that for others reasons, it’s included.
- socialized dentistry, where unless you're screaming in pain dentists take two peeks into your mouth and say it's fine and tell you to get out so they can take the next patient in the 200 person line outside (and shill their afternoon private practice to you if they happen to be the more shady type)
- private dentistry, where they'll always find something random that somehow materialized out of thin air since you were there 6 months ago to fix and bill you half your monthly salary for it, despite saying they fixed everything last time
Like, can we please get some fuckin middle ground...
(I don't know the intricacies of the Brazilian system other than it includes dentistry and is a combination of private and public systems, so I might be wrong. Folks from Brazil seem to be happy enough with it, but they might be biased).
Basic operations are all socialized by public healthcare, anything extra (and that includes white fillings instead of the ugly ones…) is private.
What would you define as socialised healthcare? Like would Belgium or the like qualify?
Not a good criteria for choosing a dentist. My dentist is a 4 hour drive away. I moved 10 years ago and I prefer the inconvenience over the risk that someone else will be selling me treatments I don't need.
What I have learned over the years is that your teeth are in a constant state of deterioration and will never be perfect. There is always some treatment that can be medically justified but, often, it doesn't need to be done.
Sure it is - it is about as good as anything else you might wind up with, especially if you don't know anyone in the area, don't have a dentist for whatever reason, or simply cannot afford to travel such distances.
And to be fair, you won't realistically know that someone is selling you treatments you do not need and you can always decline if you suspect such a thing. I'm guessing the gas money will almost cover a second opinion at a local dentist, honestly.
Full disclosure: I chose my doctor based on proximity. I was fairly new in the country, had no way to get references, and figured it'd be about the same risk as any other method, all of which were mere guesses. Probably the best doctor I've had.
Crowns and such can be done same day now, I have recently discovered.
Something like that can be worthwhile if you don't know who to trust; find someone who doesn't sell anything but the test.
Is this in the US context, or whereever you're from?
It sure doesn't seem that way here in Singapore.
I usually start flossing much more diligently a couple of weeks before my dentist visits, so that my teeth have the appearance of being better-maintained. I believe this results in more honesty from the dentist. In other words, my instinct is that they rely on their gut feeling quite a lot for making their "diagnoses." If your teeth look healthy, they are more likely to tell you they are healthy. Don't know WTF they are seeing in those blurry x-rays.
The only reason I go to the dentist at all is for general well-being reasons and polishing. When I don't have insurance, I just skip it.
Careful. It is possible for a cavity to be completely painless up to the point it is so big that the tooth actually completely collapses, and then you get to enjoy something much more annoying than getting a filling (especially a small one) such as a root canal.
If you have small cavities and don't want to get them filled and aren't sure they are the kind that if they grow won't be pain free until it is too late, look into silver diamine fluoride [1].
In the US its official use is to help people with dental hypersensitivity, but it also can stop or greatly slow cavity formation and growth. Dentists in the US can use it off-label for that.
I don't know. What you just said 100% resonates with me. But I'm not a dentist. I'm (was) a physicist, and I know the absolute garbage HN constantly writes about physics, so this might just be gellmann effect...
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Crichton#GellMannAmn...
I myself suffer from varying, chronic pain after a pointless visit where two "tiny" holes were drilled.
The trust you should afford to a dentist is inversely proportional to the amount of time and energy that dentist promotes teeth whitening products and solutions.
I think the only way is to stick with one dentists, so they see you as a long-term investment.
funfact: Yelp was inspired by the difficulty of finding good dentists.
Now I'm interested in DIY dentistry. Any pointers?
Inevitably she will retire... Then I need to find another dentist who cares most about dentistry.
The industry is apparently now dense with dentists obsessed with the business of dentistry, or even “dentist lifestyle influencers” who glamorize the business of dentistry to sell products/courses/whatever to other dentists.
You should really read the article as this is the exact problem they’re pointing out…that the whole field is rife with treatments that are not evidence-based and that what little evidence has been collected is pointing to significant over-treatment in the field.
The dentist discussed in the article would likely have been described by his patients exactly the way you describe yours. But, according to the article, he ended up settling his civil cases for close to $4m and is facing criminal charges. Which isn’t to say that your dentist is the same, but just that it’s such a natural trust relationship with your dentist that it’s really easy to end up getting procedures that aren’t necessary and dentistry doesn’t even have the data gathering infrastructure to determine which procedures really are necessary. That’s a really dangerous thing when a dentist’s financial interests are aligned with doing more procedures.
However, the article does have this:
Studies that explicitly focus on overtreatment in dentistry are rare, but a recent field experiment provides some clues about its pervasiveness. A team of researchers at ETH Zurich, a Swiss university, asked a volunteer patient with three tiny, shallow cavities to visit 180 randomly selected dentists in Zurich. The Swiss Dental Guidelines state that such minor cavities do not require fillings; rather, the dentist should monitor the decay and encourage the patient to brush regularly, which can reverse the damage. Despite this, 50 of the 180 dentists suggested unnecessary treatment. Their recommendations were incongruous: Collectively, the overzealous dentists singled out 13 different teeth for drilling; each advised one to six fillings. Similarly, in an investigation for Reader’s Digest, the writer William Ecenbarger visited 50 dentists in 28 states in the U.S. and received prescriptions ranging from a single crown to a full-mouth reconstruction, with the price tag starting at about $500 and going up to nearly $30,000.
If you’ll permit me to grossly oversimplify, I feel like dentists are to medicine what software developers are to engineering.
Both professions tend to play faster and looser with rules and standards, and tend to be closer to trade careers than most of their superset.
I've always felt it was a little bit science and a little bit art. I don't think there's an exact set of steps to every tooth and it's problem. There's just too many variables, so they have to figure it out as they go.
Two dentists in the same clinic might not do it the same way. Problem wise, two identical repairs might wear differently, causing one to last a lifetime, but another to fall out in a couple of years. A mouth gets a lot of use.
I am, however, lucky enough that my dentist will see two paths, and offer the less expensive option with a "wait and see" disclaimer. I've had no problems with those repairs, where I'm positive some others would have immediately escalated from the filling to a root canal, filling, crown, etc path.
And do confront your doctors with one another's opinion. A well meaning doctor can surely stand by their treatment recommendations with arguments and counter-arguments.
Any company dental plan I've ever had is mostly a tax advantaged benefit that saves you a bit of money but the annual max of mine is something like $2,000.
When my last cleaning came around, they of course found another cavity. When I was taken in to get it filled, I panicked in fear of the needle and threw up in the chair. They told my mom we'd have to do the procedure on another day. The dental practice did not know that we were about to move to another country, and wouldn't have time to come back. My mom decided to just wait until after the move.
When I was taken to the dentist after moving about the tooth that was meant to be filled, they had no idea what we were talking about. They didn't see anything on the x-rays and said my teeth were fine.
Ever since then I wondered how many of those filling I even needed.
I'd avoided dentists ever since and didn't see one almost 15 years until a couple of years ago when I had a wisdom tooth that needed to be taken out. I was worried that when they'd take a look at my teeth they'd find all sorts of things wrong after all that time. But aside from the wisdom tooth and a tiny cavity that they said could heal on its own, they said my teeth were fine and I didn't need to do anything else except for being better about flossing (which is when I finally got really diligent about it).
(And for the wisdom tooth extraction I specifically found a clinic that specialized in dental phobia. They let me opt for a "Wand" device to do the anesthesia of the tooth instead of a traditional needle. It looks much less like a needle, and the release of the anesthetic is entirely controlled by the device itself and not by the hand of the dentist [though of course the dentist is still the one configuring it]. That somehow made me feel better about the whole thing, since I knew the device would release anesthetic at a stable and "ideal" rate. I trusted it more than a human.)
[0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/544354.Nutrition_and_Phy...
More modern day dentist Dr John Mew suggests that wide, round dental arches with plenty of room for teeth comes from a lot of hard chewing; the tongue pressing up against the roof of the mouth to mash food also exerts an outward pressure which shapes children's mouths / faces to be wider, and that's missing with modern diets.
People elsewhere in this thread have brought up mouth breathing as a thing which dries the saliva and worsens tooth decay, that's affected by having narrow nostrils which are more difficult to breathe through, which could be affected by childhood nutrition and chewing?
At Bristle, we’ve created an at-home oral health test that also pairs you with ingredient recommendations to prevent the progression of oral disease. The goal is to give data around oral health without the misaligned incentives of a practitioner who benefits from your demise.
For my next checkup, I searched and searched for a dentist who spoke in unaccented English I could clearly understand. He checked my teeth and cheerfully told me I needed to have all my lower front teeth removed and a bridge implant. Out of pocket cost: $30,000.
I couldn’t possibly afford this and decided to get a second opinion. The problem is, my insurance only covers one checkup every 6 months. In the meantime I agonized over how I would possibly pay for my extensive dental work, and I managed to find another dentist with whom I could communicate.
I asked this dentist if I needed the $30,000 procedure and she scoffed!
I was instantly furious and gave the Rolls Royce doctor bad reviews on Yelp and Google Maps. I’ve been getting a real-life lesson on the practices described in the article. I plan on sharing it with everyone I know.
I’ve learned from him that over treatment and bad quality work is shockingly common. Part of the reason is how dentistry is taught in this country: people take out very expensive loans for dental school, so they want to start practicing right away while also over-treating to pay down loans. It used to be cheaper and people would apprentice — that is now rare. You see this in medicine too where they pack as many people as possible into a day, who cares if the quality is low per person.
The vast majority of dentists he sues are general dentists. They often don’t have the training and/or equipment to do surgery, and it results in things like drilling into nerves which cannot be undone. A lifetime of burning pain is the consequence. Again: no undo.
My best advice is to always see a specialist, even for a teeth cleaning. They have additional schooling and demonstrate a desire to go deeper in the profession. Prosthodontists will do cleanings, and their inspection will be far more valuable than a general/family dentist. They’ll also know which specialists to send you to for various procedures and won’t attempt to do something outside of their training.
About a year ago, I was told by a dentist (in a larger clinic) I needed to have gold filling in my molars (because gold is least reactive, better than ceramic and gets the dentist a pretty penny). I was quoted ~$500 after the insurance. Also suggested was some SMILE UV procedure to whiten the enamel. I was reluctant as well as mortified. The whole convincing act sounded more like a sales pitch. I went to a second dentist, who runs his own singularly run establishment (the current one in question) and he flatly told me 'no'. My teeth were in good shape mostly (minus some coffee stains & a cavity). Since it was about closing time, he sat me down over a quick bite & went through the dental physiology - and why he considered it pointless. In the end, he added since I was on insurance I had nothing much to lose monetarily, but by doing Dentist A's suggestions, I was primed to keep visiting every few years for fixes. He had nothing to gain by turning me away. That was a huge confidence booster. Honesty was a huge factor in getting my trust.
It opened my eyes to the fact that the vaunted & strictly regulated Japanese health care has its share of bad apples too. Dental treatment is a money spinner even in Japan. Although, mostly operating assiduously and in good faith, we need to still look out for some bad actors. (I have another terrible story - but it pertains to opthalmologists)
Bonus: Since he turned out such a nice guy I get him souvenir candies (ironic!) from wherever I go traveling. And he cauterizes my sporadic canker mouth sores without ever charging a dime :)
Around 10 years ago, during one of the dentists appointment, my wife had to perform an x-ray scan of the whole mouth. Besides the stuff dentist wanted to confirm, he found out that she has her wisdom teeth grew in a little problematic direction that might become painful in very short time and suggested to remove them before that happens.
That said, such operation would require narcosis. Both of us are very skeptical when someone wants to do something for us that requires putting us into that state so we've gone to another dentist to get another opinion.
Turned out, that other dentist said that he don't see any problem with my wife's wisdom teeth and warned us, that the operation other dentist suggested was very dangerous and had high probability that it could break some jaw nerves very easily which could lead to partly face paralysis.
So yeah, 10 years has passed and my wife has never experienced any pain caused by her wisdom teeth - maybe got lucky or maybe that 1st dentist was just plain wrong.
But in the end I've always tend to be warned and while having any doubts, it's worth to spend some money just to double check if suggested treatment is really good for us (or necessary).
I'd never had a filling before, so this was a very big deal for me. The dentist had time, so he just did it right after my cleaning. The only word I have for how I felt was raped. I don't use that lightly. It was emotionally traumatic to have someone pressure you like that, not give you a clear choice, and violate your body.
I kept going there just because I was lazy, and I went on a day the dentist was out of the office, so the hygienist just showed him the xrays. When he found another one several years later, I got a second opinion. He said it was something a more aggressive dentist might go after, so the diagnosis wasn't outright wrong, but probably overly aggressive.
Never went back to the first dentist. 7 years later, it's still fine. I suspect most of my fillings were the same story.
My current dentist probably overtreats with 4 cleanings per year, but I'd rather pay for the extra cleanings.
The biggest innovation in the last 50 years are titanium dental implants (very expensive) and the use of ceramic and acrylic (more expensive) over the insane amalgam fillings with mercury. And yet, many dentists still put the health hazard of amalgam with mercury in people's mouths (like it's a tradition) or do root canals which keep dead toxic teeth in mouths too. If you want less toxic options, then you must pay for much more expensive procedures.
The "mercury" metal fillings last much longer - no longer why dentists try to use the fear of mercury poisoning to sell you on a replacement plan. Thanks, but no thanks.
The dose we are exposed to, as patients, is negligible. If there's a health problem, it's for dentists.
I developed this theory after finding one the 'old fashioned' way, through reviews and word of mouth, and he convinced me I had six cavities and I let him drill and fill two of them before I got a second opinion. Turns out I had no cavities, and didn't need the first two filled either; just a few spots to watch.
Ex. Recently France sentenced one dentist to 10yr for doing procedures that were not needed (same combo root canal + crowns): https://www.lefigaro.fr/faits-divers/c-est-un-carnage-un-anc...
My pet peeve is about the number of x-ray my dentist performs. Every time, everything is fine. Feels like the sole reason, is that my insurance pays for me to be radiated once a year.
Without discounting any of the bad experiences people have had here: I've been going to the same dentist for 30 years. He never suggested teeth whitening to me, even though I obviously could have benefitted from it, and did when I explicitly asked for it.
In a way, painless dentistry probably increases the profit-seeking. At one time, drilling and other procedures were incredibly painful. Now they're only painful to your wallet.
If you break a finger, the orthopedist doesn't usually give you a finger canal that removes all of the nerves, blood vessels, and bone marrow and replaces it with some kind of resin composite.
Though I guess they are into expensive and horribly invasive hip and knee replacements.
It seems that minimally invasive dentistry is a thing - hopefully it will catch on.
But someone is setting up a practice in my area (South London) that fits with what a lot of people here are seeing: he's opened three surgeries in the immediate area, there's lots of advertising for expensive procedures, and he drives a Lamborghini. All that has got to be paid for somehow.
In my home country of Romania I sometimes almost have to ask my dentist to take my money. Since on check-ups I usually don't need any work done, he just lets me off without payment. This has actually happened to me a number of different times with different doctors.
I don’t think this acquiring dentist asked some basic questions before buying.
“How much was your revenue last year?”
“$900k”
“How many patients did you see last year?”
“1000”
“ok that’s $900 avg per patient. You charge $50 per cleaning, twice a year…holy shit”
Now, also in Italy the Anglo American idea that dentists are not fully medicine has been adopted as well, and at the university there is a path for dentistry alone. And it doesn't make any sense.
It would seem fear and anxiety are actually the dentist's most profitable products.
The total cost to get a new tooth was like $5k. I got an implant done so that a crown could be placed later down the road and I am deferring the crown. And of course, the new dentist is using a similar scare tactic:”act now! The implant might blah blah blah.”
Sometimes, I wonder if dentistry is the world most accepted sham.
You should know that our days are basically spent in an almost PTSD status after having undergone years of abuse by patients in the form of dark, frustrating patterns that repeat every week. These are behavioral patterns that typically leave us in a frustrating and infuriating lose-lose situation through no fault of our own, and they seem ingrained in the general population.
A few examples: in my clinic and those of my colleagues about 75% of african immigrants that book an appointment, and confirm it 2 days before, end up no-showing for the appointment, and don't even answer the phone when we call them. this happens several times a week. I haven't found a solution because I can't just say "you're an immigrant and I won't book your appointment", nor can I make them prepay while holding native residents exempt from this rule. No-showing means I lose a sizable amount of revenue while having to pay the staff for nothing. Example 2: a good percentage (20%?) of those with an infection are given antibiotics, I explain they should come back when the pain has subsided, -usually a few days- to perform the root canal / extraction (which will allow me to use anesthesia effectively - it doesnt work when you have an infection) and they also end up no-showing because "it doesnt hurt any more", without bothering to answer their phone when we call them. They call back 2 months later, in pain, demanding to be seen -today-, at which point my blood is boiling. Bear in mind I explain this at least 3 times during the first appointment. Example 3: randomly, a good patient will turn rogue and decide that the crown I'm doing on her canine "looks too big" or "is too rounded" or some other subjective aesthetic bullshit like that. it's typically a middle-class 50-60 woman. This happened today to me, I showed the crown's thickness to the patient with a measurement tool, it was 0.5 -millimeters- and explained it's physically impossible to make it any thinner. Her answer "it's your problem, I'm not a dentist". These patients will typically then refuse to pay for about 1000$ of work, despite the work being first class, because "they are not happy". This happens randomly and is not predictable despite my best efforts, and is peppered with ridiculous episodes like crying in the chair, calling their husband who will typically back their claims and then start guilt-shaming you with gems like "my wife is so distressed by this. we are both deeply hurt." Example 4: a patient will randomly decide he will try to leave a bill unpaid, and they will adopt every kind of trick and dark pattern in the playbook. Lies, asking to delay the payment so they can stiff me out of 4 fillings instead of just one etc..this happens multiple times a year. Example 5: patients taking impressions for, say, a night guard, after being explained the cost and days it takes to make it. We typically deliver then a week later. They will then call a day before their delivery, when the night guard has already been made, saying "doctor I've decided I don't want it any more, I want to cancel the appointment, k thx bye". That is the average message, and I stress the "k thx bye" part where they make it clear they don't even want a reply and it's all said and done (typically because they think they can buy a 20$ nightguard on amazon instead). They will refuse to pay for the nightguard that's already been made and the laboratory has already billed me.
I could go on for hours and cite about 40-50 of these patterns that we see day in and day out, they put you in a very frustrating position where choice 1 is bad and choice 2 is even worse (say, suing the patient for collections as option 1 and taking a direct loss as option 2).
It almost got me burned out and I know several colleagues who either have burned out, or completely changed profession because of the widespread lack of basic respect and fairness from patients.
This happens while, as someone else said, you're in xxx,xxx$ debt, so you can imagine being told unfairly that you have to eat a 1000$ loss for something that's not your fault, tends to make you want to scream. I know I went home shouting in my car more than once asking what I did wrong to be subjected to this bullshit day in and day out.
It's a incredibly abusive profession and it has a very high suicide rate (at like 3x the average for other professions, this is true for most medical professions by the way). And I won't even talk about the physical toll it has on you because I don't mind working 8 hours even in uncomfortable positions, but seeing the way people lie, cheat and try to blame-shame you tends to take away all faith in humanity. So yes, there are bad dentists just as there are bad -anything-, but there are also bad patients. I guess I just wanted to vent and let you see the other side of the coin...we say "no good deed goes unpunished" and it's true indeed
Side note: I've had to prepay for appliances and night guards in the past when the cost exceeded some threshold - the latter wound up being supremely disappointing considering it was ~$600 and broke within a fortnight, but I didn't bother complaining to the dentist since the staff would just have to argue with the fab.
I hear you, the vast majority of humans are fucked up. On an average the patient is more messed up than the medical practitioner, what to do?
If you have a certain profile of patient who often break their appointments, you can simply double-book a certain percentage of them. That is, if you need to schedule three such patients, have two come at 1 PM and the third come at 2 PM. If you expect that one will break, you'll still take care of the other two in two hours. (adjust these times if you are faster or slower) If neither of the 1 PM patients break, or especially if none of them break, somebody will have to wait for a bit. So what? You're a dentist; your time is more valuable than your patients'. If one of these patients gets pissed about this, that's two strikes against her since she is already more likely to break appointments. You don't need a patient with two strikes.
Patients who don't have insurance or who have insufficient insurance (granted, this latter situation is sometimes hard to know in advance) have to pay when they receive service. If you explain this before the work is done (since you have informative treatment plans, patients are never surprised by a bill), then someone who doesn't pay can be referred to the prosecutor for fraud.
Never run "payment plans" through your office. Always use an outside agency like CareCredit or Lending Club. If they won't loan the patient money, then you certainly shouldn't. You do have to pay these firms, so if your schedule is full then nobody gets credit. If your schedule isn't full these fees come out of the marketing budget. If you try to handle loans yourself you'll end up paying more.
Procedures that require lab work are billed on the first appointment, and the patient has to pay half in order for the case to be sent to the lab. You explain this ahead of time, and if you're using the right labs (hint: most of them are in China) you'll still make a profit if someone breaks the second appointment.
The effective dentists I've seen have set up policies that automatically handle bad patient behavior without need for argument or personal involvement. These policies can change based on your experience. You shouldn't be on the front line of implementation, however. The people you have on the phone have to be able to schedule defensively, so you won't be sitting around with no patients. The person you have handling treatment plans has to properly communicate payment terms before you begin expensive procedures. You might have to get involved with particularly evil patients, but if you don't have to address these problems for most patients you'll probably avoid some frustration. Good luck!
I'm jealous of this. Most of our problems come from dealing with insurance.
...99% of other offices do not make patients pre-pay...
This is interesting. By "pre-pay", you mean "pay on the same day that work is done"? Expecting payment afterward seems destined to lead to an untenable collections situation, especially with poorer patients.
Fair warning, this is a long post with a lot of buildup of my own experience with the dentist. The relevant part is the last couple paragraphs but context is all before.
A few years ago I had horrible dental anxiety. Enough so that I would have a fight or flight moment just sitting in a chair. When I was young (baby teeth coming out age) I had been told that I was going in specifically so some teeth could be loosened so they would come out naturally. That did not happen, they pulled them outright and that forever broke my trust. They even had to use those sizer like clamps to keep my mouth open (the ones that sit on your tongue, not the nice cheek ones we have now) I was lied too, and at a young age. Maybe they though I would be less scared but it hurt my trust going forward. But basically I did not go to the dentist after that point unless my parents dragged me... and I put up enough of a fight both getting there and in the chair that they gave up. I wasn't a brat, I had no issue with the doctor... I was just scared out of my god damn mind. Once I became an adult I didn't go to the dentist for... 6 or so years.
I even chipped a tooth and the idea of going the dentist scared me so much that I was desperately looking for some "secret" solution to grow back the tooth... as an adult. But I even ignored that.
Finally my wisdom teeth happened. And they hurt like hell, but they actually came in fine. But they got a cavity because while the teeth themselves came in, fitting brush between them is another story. I was in horrible pain and I could not let it go any longer. I was still scared shitless but... pain is quite the motivator.
I remember the first Dentist I went to. It was a big chain (I don't know if national but there are a lot of them. I called them and explained my situation. I stressed that I had a lot of dental anxiety and why. They reassured me that they had someone who specialized in this. So I get there... explain again why I have anxiety. He proceeds to do the examination without tools, just taking a look at things. He does the X-rays. And then right as we are about to leave, he takes one of the tools and quickly scrapes one of my teeth (with no warning)... I have not wanted to run out of a place quicker in my life. It wasn't a necessary scrape, I am convinced he did it to be like "See this isn't too bad" He completely ignored WHY I had anxiety. I was not happy... It isn't the tools it was the being lied too. The tools never bothered me (that's partially a lie, if I had to see the open mouth clamps that they used when I was young I would probably scream).
Finally I found another dentist. Slightly more upscale to be honest, but there were some basic things they did that tremendously helped me... like before I ever came in the dentist called me to chat to see how I was handling the pain, to make sure I was comfortable with what the appointment (to be clear this was not his assistant, but the actual dentist). I got to meet him on my terms, home on my couch. When I finally got there I never felt rushed, I was told I could come in early and just sit in the chair if I needed (not sit back until I was ready). I was checked on by various people during this time, but when he finally came in for the actual appointment I was laying back in the chair... anxious but calm because I got there on my terms.
Flash forward... and I have for sure had a fair number of operations from them. 3 teeth extractions (2 of them being impacted with each other), 2 of my wisdom teeth came out, 2 root canals, several crowns and I don't know how many cavities at this point. I also had to have a deep cleaning and now I go in for a cleaning every 3 months to manage that. There is that voice in the back of my mind that wonders if it was all necessary. If I actually need to go in every 3 months. But I find myself reluctant to think about that because I know that... if it wasn't for them I would not be working on my teeth at all. I strongly feel like if I tried to go somewhere else, my anxiety would not be as bad but a lot of my comfort now is tied to my relationship with them.
I know horror stories like what is outlined in this article are nothing new and we have heard things like this before... but I wish this particular industry was better.
A lot of the problems are the result of misaligned incentives. While it's applicable to almost all of healthcare, it's especially prevalent in dental. Providing high-level what I've seen with the understanding that I am talking about the worst outcomes of our care model and certainly not hitting all of the problems. That said, I have met many more dentists who genuinely care about their patients than those who don't - and I truly believe that is the norm.
*Payers* Dental insurance is glorified discounting. Medical insurance provides annual out-of-pocket maximums (deductibles) where anything you pay beyond that is covered by the insurer. Dental insurance is the opposite. There is an annual maximum the insurer will cover (usually ~$1500) and anything beyond that is covered by the patient. In both cases there are some covered services (medical: checkups, some tests, etc. dental: X-rays, cleanings, etc.) but the second you have something even marginally serious your insurance SHOULD kick in. The problem with dental is that it doesn't. I've spoken with people that had to defer necessary procedures for a year because insurance could only cover half - so 1/2 this year and 1/2 next year.
The problem with this model is that while medical insurance is (theoretically) more incentivized to keep costs low since they will have to pay for major care, dental insurance has a natural ceiling. Yes, if you need $5k of dental work the insurer "suffers" - but it's maxed out for whatever your coverage limit is. There's not a severe financial downside to extensive care.
*Providers* Complimentary to the model of dental insurance is a fee-for-service (FFS) model for care. What this means is that providers are paid based on services. In other words, a provider makes more money doing a cavity filling than not having to do one because they kept you healthy.
The extreme opposite would be a model where a dentist was financially penalized every time you needed a filling - you can imagine how the relationship and role of the provider would change.
Something that gets overlooked, but is important to call out, is that the system for becoming a dentist doesn't help. There are 4 years of dental school. When you graduate, you're likely $XXX,XXX in debt. On top of that, private practice is still extremely prevalent in dental care - so add another $XXX,XXX in debt. Plus the cost of the equipment you need. This isn't an excuse, but its a reality for many dentists. When you combine massive debt and a care model that prioritizes paying for procedures the result is what we see today.
The other problem is that this misalignment means providers have to make personal/ethical choices around care. Sometimes those choices mean performing unnecessary procedures on patients. Sometimes it's the opposite, and the provider takes a personal hit on revenue. So you end up with 5 second-opinions, none of which line up to the others. A provider should not have to choose - or eve consider - ethical responsibility to patients vs. financial stability.
*Patients* We - patients - get shafted in dental care. Our system is incentivized to reactively treat disease over maintaining good health. On average we pay [40% of dental expenditures out of pocket](https://www.carequest.org/system/files/CareQuest-Institute-B...). That's ~4x more than the average for all other healthcare services.
We're left to navigate oral care on our own. Of course you're skeptical when a dentist says you need 10 fillings - they're incentivized to perform the procedures. Would you be as skeptical if you knew the dentist was getting charged $50 for every filling they had to do? Do you think the care model would change if dental insurers suddenly had to pay for your $10k dental procedure instead of you?
Cavities and gum disease - largely preventable conditions - are the most prevalent diseases on the planet. And we're not talking about some complex, mysterious disease. These are microbial infections. We have tools to detect them early and interventions that work (at least work well enough to make a major dent). Misaligned incentives don't motivate anyone to adopt these technologies or encourage preventive care.
Anyway, that's my rant. There are lots of things I didn't cover but I have to get back to work. Linking [my company here](https://www.bristlehealth.com/) to minimize self-promoting but provide some more info.
This is an American thing. In Europe if a wisdom tooth doesn't hurt, you don't remove it.
My Japanese dentist has also continually kept pushing for me to remove one of my wisdom teeth since "its hard to keep clean down there"
No... You say that everybody is "coming around to the idea that...", which makes it sound like people used to believe that you should routinely remove wisdom teeth and now that's changing. No, in Europe this was never common belief. So people aren't "coming around to the idea that..."