lmgtfy:
He's contradicting Chomsky on creativity (so do I) but without acknowledging that Chomsky ever existed or wrote. Ditto Wittgenstein on ordinary language, for example defining games - you can't just hand wave away ordinary usage, as Wolfram does without ever acknowledging that Wittgenstein ever lived or wrote. Kolmogorov has a specific definitionor of complexity as instantiated by Turing machines. Simple rules can create complex swirling patterns (something Turing covered in predicting correctly how animal hide coloring patterns are generated.)
Note that K complexity, W on games and definitions, and Chomsky on "creativity" are not obscure doctrines but perhaps what they're best known for. You don't have to agree with any of these doctrines, perhaps, but you're not philosophically literate if you are truly unaware of them, as he seems to be.
Belay your slurs and imputed motives.