There is a bunch of pictures here[0], and you can spot in some of them where it says "Spor 0". But I assume "track 0" isn't _that_ uncommon after all.
Which leads me to wonder whether a "track -1" exists anywhere.
In France sometimes tracks aren't numbered but lettered. Sometimes they're both - e.g. the same train station can have tracks A, B, 1, 2, 3, 4 ( e.g. Avignon TGV, where 1 and 4 are for stopping high speed trains, 2,3 are for passing through high speed trains, and A(maybe also B, don't remember) is a separate track terminating at that station for the commuter rail link to Avignon's main railway station). Sometimes there are weird likes like only two tracks, one is 1bis, the other A. Or 1 and 1bis. Usually it's related to the historical evolution of the train station ( e.g. in the 1/1bis case it was a single track station which was expanded).
https://indebuurt.nl/nijmegen/genieten-van/mysteries/nijmeeg...
One such (obvious) exception is OK with me. Its annoying when every train station has random track numbers though.
Tracks are numbered logically or at least start out that way, but in some stations, many tracks don’t border a passenger platform (which freight trains don’t need)
If there’s a shunting yard nearby, there can be many such tracks. Looking at http://www.sporenplan.nl/html_de/sporenplan/ns/ns_65/nm.html, that may be the case for Nijmegen.
I don’t know what rules they use for renumbering tracks, but they must weigh the cost of redocumenting things and retraining personnel (likely the trickier part. Some of them may have known the track numbers for decades, so reassigning number to make them easier to learn can be risky. From a safety viewpoint, moving from 1,2,3… to A,B,C… may be a better option) against the training of future employees.
However, I was in Kings Cross yesterday and was amused when I saw a sign for platforms 0 to 8.
[1] https://www.aargauerzeitung.ch/panorama/vermischtes/in-aarau...