It should not surprise me that the Washington Post, the paper that ran 2-3 hit pieces per day against Musk after he announced his intent to acquire twitter is now running a hit piece against Tesla with a misleading title.
What is missing however is the percentage of crash per amount of cars registered with and without assistance equipment and per brand. I have no way from this article to know if it fare better or worse than other brands and/or traditionnally operated cars.
A less misleading title would be "Tesla autopilot involved in 70% of driving-assistance accidents this year"
Even that is potentially misleading if Tesla autopilot represents more than 70% of driver assisted miles on the road
To me it doesn't look like unfair reporting but instead i see a group of people accusing with loaded language ("hit pieces" is loaded) normal reporting to be biased against Musk because "daddy can't be wrong" and criticism must there for be an attack.